ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
Ways and tradition of Japan in esophageal surgery for cancer.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions on postoperative nutritional and mental status of patients with esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Induction of Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 13 and TET2/3 by Anticancer Drugs and Poor Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Preoperative Treatment.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Pararespiratory and paradigestive lymph node metastases in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: predicting survival and refining the N staging system.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Machine learning to predict occult metastatic lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of the prognostic utility of preoperative nutritional parameters in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Critical Factors of Postoperative Arrhythmia and Preventive Measures of Deep Venous Thrombosis.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis report presents the essence in practice of Japanese methods and tradition in surgery for esophageal cancer.
methodsThe etiology of esophageal cancer and the concepts of lymphadenectomy in esophagectomy, in neoadjuvant treatments, and in stage classifications are compared between Western countries and Japan.
resultsWith respect to the type and relative incidence of esophageal cancer, in Western countries, adenocarcinoma in the lower thoracic esophagus and in the cardia is common, and among esophageal surgeons, there remains some controversy over the extent of lymphadenectomy. On the other hand, in Japan, squamous cell carcinoma in the middle thoracic esophagus is common, and concerning lymphadenectomy, Japanese esophageal surgeons consider that three-field lymphadenectomy is superior to other types of lymphadenectomy. In Japan, surgeons believe that most patients with esophageal cancer even those having lymph node metastasis can be best treated using esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy.
conclusionsIn Japan, the tradition in esophageal surgery places great significance on lymphadenectomy. The ways and procedures for esophageal cancer surgery, the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, the Esophageal Cancer Practice Guidelines, and other scientific reports are all based on a close combination of esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.