Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350723›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Stool Antigen Testing, a Reliable Noninvasive Method of Assessment of Helicobacter pylori Infection Among Patients with Gastro-duodenal Disorders in Cameroon.

Laure Brigitte Kouitcheu Mabeku, Mohamadou Bello Epesse, Stephane Fotsing, Roland Kamgang, Magloire Tchidjo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05957432 (Efficacy and Safety of Black Seed Oil With Vonoprazan Based Triple Therapy in Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05957432 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Black Seed Oil With Vonoprazan Based Triple Therapy in Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori InfectionArmsBlack Seed Oil Cap/Tab, Vonoprazan, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rate ofFuture science OA · 2025
    Article
  3. Review of Methods for DetectionJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Pangenome Analysis ofInternational journal of genomics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laure Brigitte Kouitcheu MabekuMicrobiology and Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P. O. Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon. laurebkouitcheu@yahoo.fr.
Mohamadou Bello EpesseMicrobiology and Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P. O. Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon.
Stephane FotsingGastroenterology Department, Laquintinie Hospital of Douala, P. O. Box 4035, Douala, Cameroon.
Roland KamgangGastroenterology Department, Polyclinique de Poitiers, P. O. Box 15422, Douala, Cameroon.
Magloire TchidjoGastroenterology Department, Polyclinique de Poitiers, P. O. Box 15422, Douala, Cameroon.
University of Douala · CMUniversité de Dschang · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral techniques such as invasive and noninvasive are used for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

aimThe aim of this study was to compare the results of rapid urease test, stool antigen test and serology in diagnosing H. pylori infection in Cameroon.

methodsHundred patients (66 women and 34 men) were enrolled. Each patient gave a written consent. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee of Medical Sciences and the institutional review board. From each patient, blood, stool and gastric biopsies samples were collected for H. pylori detection using three methods: stool antigen test, serology and rapid urease test (RUT), taken as gold standard. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph pad Prism 7.

resultsHelicobacter pylori infection was detected in 43%, 45% and 73% of patients based on the RUT, stool antigen test and serology, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between serology and RUT (P = 0.0026), but not between stool antigens test and RUT (P = 0.288). Taken RUT as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of stool antigens test and serology were 65.11, 70.17, 62.22 and 72.72%; 88.37, 40.35, 55.77 and 82.14%, respectively. The accuracy of stool antigen test and serology was 68 and 61%, respectively.

conclusionsOur finding showed that stool antigen test can be used as a noninvasive method of assessment of H. pylori infection in our setting. Serological test can be used in screening; however, further diagnostic tests need to be carried out to confirm seropositive cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, BacterialCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesDuodenumFecesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, BacterialCameroonDiagnosticH. pylori infectionRapid urease testSerologyStool antigen test

Identifiers

PMID32350723
OpenAlexW3022012641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.