ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Predicting pulmonary hypertension in sarcoidosis; value of PH probability on echocardiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a well-recognised complication of sarcoidosis. Non-invasive diagnosis is challenging due to limited accuracy of echocardiography in interstitial lung disease. This study evaluates the value of echocardiographic PH probability for diagnosing PH in pulmonary sarcoidosis. All consecutive patients between August 2015 and November 2018 were prospectively screened for PH, and classified as low, intermediate or high PH probability. Patients with intermediate or high PH probability were referred for right heart catheterisation. PH was defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥ 25 mm Hg. Additional data on pulmonary function and chest-CT was collected. Of all 479 patients, PH was present in 17 and absent in 19 patients. Six patients refused right heart catheterisation. PH was present in 33% and 75% of patients with intermediate and high PH probability respectively (n = 36). TRV max was measurable in 46% of all patients. Measurability did not correlate with FVC% predicted or presence of significant fibrosis. In intermediate and high PH probability, TRV max < 2.9 m/s successfully ruled out PH whereas a TRV max > 3.4 confirmed PH in all patients. If TRV max was absent or in between 2.9 and 3.4, secondary echocardiographic signs were not able to improve the diagnostic accuracy. PH is unlikely in patients with a TRV max < 2.9 m/s on echocardiography, whereas PH is highly suspected in a TRV max > 3.4 m/s. Discrimination is challenging if the TRV max is between 2.9-3.4 m/s or absent. Additional secondary signs do not improve discrimination. Decision making for further investigations should be made by an expert team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.