Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350693›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Valentina Andreasi, Francesca Muffatti, Giovanni Guarneri, Massimo Falconi, Stefano Partelli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Minimally invasiveWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina AndreasiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Francesca MuffattiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni GuarneriPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FalconiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Stefano PartelliPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (ENETS Center of Excellence), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. partelli.stefano@hsr.it.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are increasingly recognized entities, whose incidence has dramatically grown during the last two decades. Surgery plays a pivotal role in their management as it represents the only chance of cure. Since PanNENs display a wide range of aggressiveness, their surgical management needs to be tailored on tumor's and patient's characteristics. Currently, there are several open questions and burning issues in the field of PanNEN, such as the management of asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) ≤ 2 cm. An active surveillance of these small lesions has been demonstrated to be safe although the available evidences are only based on retrospective studies. On the other hand, formal pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy represents the gold standard for patients with localized NF-PanNEN > 2 cm or NF-PanNEN ≤ 2 cm in the presence of symptoms, dilation of the main pancreatic duct or suspicion of nodal metastases. Surgery plays also an important role in the setting of metastatic disease. In particular, surgery is generally recommended in the presence of low-grade, resectable, metastatic disease, but several series have reported also a survival benefit of palliative primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The role of surgery in PanNEN G3 is still controversial. Indeed, surgery is associated with an improved survival in patients with well-differentiated PanNET G3, whereas there is almost no survival benefit in case of poorly differentiated lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease ManagementFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPalliative CarePancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorLymphadenectomyMEN-1 syndromePalliative resectionPancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasmsPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32350693
OpenAlexW3023697903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.