Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350674›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute middle cerebral artery M2 segment occlusion with regard to vessel involvement.

Vivien Lorena Ivan, Christian Rubbert, Julian Caspers, John-Ih Lee, Michael Gliem, Sebastian Jander, Bernd Turowski, Marius Kaschner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of SOFIA aspiration catheter for mechanical thrombectomy via ADAPT and Solumbra echniques in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivien Lorena IvanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany. vivien.ivan@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Christian RubbertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Julian CaspersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
John-Ih LeeDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael GliemDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sebastian JanderDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bernd TurowskiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Marius KaschnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular treatment (EVT) is an established procedure in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the proximal M1-segment of middle cerebral artery. The assessment of distal thrombectomy in daily clinical routine has not yet been sufficiently evaluated.

methodsPatients with M2-segment-occlusions treated by EVT in the local department (January 2012-December 2017) were included (n = 57, mean National-Institutes-of-Health-Stroke-Scale of 11, range 0-20). Patients were grouped according to localization of M2-occlusion (Cohort A (n = 14): central region only, B (n = 24): central region and involvement of frontal vessels, C (n = 19): parietal, occipital, and/or temporal vessels). Differences in proximal (M2-trunk, n = 34) and distal (M2-branches, n = 23) occlusions were also examined. Reperfusion (Thrombolysis-In-Cerebral-Infarction (TICI)), early clinical outcome at discharge (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), and complications (hemorrhage, new emboli) were noted.

resultSuccessful reperfusion (TICI2b-3) was found in 49 patients (86.0%). Favorable early clinical outcome (mRS0-2) was achieved in n = 19 (37.7%). Compared to admission, mRS at discharge improved significantly (median (admission) 5 vs. median (discharge) 4, p < 0.001). Early clinical outcome was more favorable in patients with better reperfusion (TICI2b-3: mean mRS 3 ± 1.7 vs. TICI0-2a: mean mRS 4.4 ± 1.4, p = 0.037). Six (10.5%) patients suffered from symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage during treatment or hospitalization. Four patients died (7.0%). No significant differences in favorable clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2: Cohort A 42.9%, B 50.0%, C 16.7%, p = 0.4; χ

conclusionEVT in patients with acute M2-occlusion is safe and leads to a significant clinical improvement at discharge. No significant differences in clinical outcome or complications were found with regard to the localization of the M2-occlusion.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresStrokeHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMiddle Cerebral ArteryRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeEndovascular treatmentM2-segment occlusionsThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID32350674
OpenAlexW3022606807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.