ArticleEuropean radiology2020
MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579911 (Combining High-frequency Micro-ultrasound Target Biopsy and Multiparametric MRI Target Biopsy - Does it Increase the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? A Prospective, Interventional, Single Centre, Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Combining High-frequency Micro-ultrasound Target Biopsy and Multiparametric MRI Target Biopsy - Does it Increase the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? A Prospective, Interventional, Single Centre, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micro-ultrasonography- vs MRI-targeted biopsy in prostate cancer: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using targeted MRI-informed microultrasound biopsy.European radiology · 2026Article
- New kids on the block: MRI guided transrectal focused US, TULSA, focal laser ablation, histotripsy - a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- Micro-Ultrasound in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison with Multiparametric MRI.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Advanced Imaging for Localized Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Advances in radiology and pathology of prostate cancer: a review for the pathologist.Pathologica · 2024Review
- The diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer diagnosis: a review.World journal of urology · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of micro-ultrasound guided biopsies in patients with suspected prostate cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2023Article
- Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.Cancers · 2022Review
- Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.Cancer management and research · 2022Review
- Micro-Ultrasound: a way to bring imaging for prostate cancer back to urology.Prostate international · 2021Review
- Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the ability of high-frequency (29 MHz) transrectal micro-ultrasound (microUS) as a second-look examination after biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) and to reidentify focal lesions seen on diagnostic MRI and to detect new ones
methodsA total of 118 consecutive men (mean age, 66 ± 13 [SD] years; range, 49-93 years) with a mean prostate-specific antigen level of 11 ± 19 (SD) ng/mL (range, 2-200 ng/mL) and at least one focal lesion (MRI+) with a score > 2 on bp-MRI were included. Of these, 79/118 (66.9%) were biopsy-naïve and 102/118 (86.5%) had non-suspicious rectal examination. All patients had MRI-directed microUS-guided biopsy using a 29-MHz transducer. All lesions visible on micro-ultrasound (microUS+) were targeted without image fusion, which was only used for MRI+/microUS- lesions. Significant prostate cancer (sPCa) was defined by a Gleason score ≥ 7 or a maximum cancer core length > 3 mm.
resultsA total of 144 focal prostatic lesions were analyzed, including 114 (114/144, 79.2%) MRI+/microUS+ lesions, 13 MRI+/microUS- lesions (13/144, 9%), and 17 MRI-/microUS+ lesions (17/144, 11.8%). Significant PCa was detected in 70 MRI+/microUS+ lesions (70/114, 61.4%), in no MRI+/microUS- lesion (0/13, 0%), and in 4 MRI-/microUS+ lesions (4/17, 23.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of microUS on a per-patient and a per-lesion basis were 100% (95% CI, 84.9-100%) and 22.8% (95% CI, 12.5-35.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 85.1-100%) and 22.6% (95% CI, 12.3-36.2%), respectively.
conclusionMicroUS, as a second-look examination, may show promise to localize targets detected on bp-MRI. KEY POINTS: • Used as a second-look examination, microUS-guided biopsies have a 100% detection rate of sCa originating in the PZ or lower third of the TZ, without microUS-MRI image fusion. • MicroUS results may provide additional information about lesions visible on MRI. • MicroUS may provide the ability to detect small PZ lesions undetected by bp-MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.