ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Automated classification of solid renal masses on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using convolutional neural network with decision fusion.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in detection of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- CT radiomics for differentiating oncocytoma from renal cell carcinomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical imaging · 2023Pooled it
- A deep learning-based approach for the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma: a new trial using CT.The British journal of radiology · 2022Trial
- Machine learning pipeline for automated segmentation and classification of complicated cystic renal masses on MRI: comparison with radiologists' assessments.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- A two-stage deep learning framework for kidney disease detection using modified specular-free imaging and EfficientNetB2.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic Recognition Algorithm for Renal Tumors and Cysts in CT Images using Mamba and YOLO11Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Optimized machine learning based comparative analysis of predictive models for classification of kidney tumors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Detecting and Subtyping Renal Cell Carcinoma on Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans Using 2D Neural Network with Feature Consistency Techniques.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of CT for extrarenal fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Imaging-based deep learning in kidney diseases: recent progress and future prospects.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
- Detection of renal cell hydronephrosis in ultrasound kidney images: a study on the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Exploratory Analysis of the Role of Radiomic Features in the Differentiation of Oncocytoma and Chromophobe RCC in the Nephrographic CT Phase.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A pilot radiometabolomics integration study for the characterization of renal oncocytic neoplasia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Kidney Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery Selection by Machine Learning from CT Scans Combined with Clinical Metadata.Cancers · 2023Article
- Role of AI and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Brief Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Deep-learning-based ensemble method for fully automated detection of renal masses on magnetic resonance images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Recognizing pathology of renal tumor from macroscopic cross-section image by deep learning.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- AI-Driven Robust Kidney and Renal Mass Segmentation and Classification on 3D CT Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in Imaging-Based Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Critical Analysis of the Current Literature.Cancers · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence for early detection of renal cancer in computed tomography: A review.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning-based method for automated classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign solid renal masses using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images.
methodsThis institutional review board-approved retrospective study evaluated CECT in 315 patients with 77 benign (57 oncocytomas, and 20 fat-poor angiomyolipoma) and 238 malignant (RCC: 123 clear cell, 69 papillary, and 46 chromophobe subtypes) tumors identified consecutively between 2015 and 2017. We employed a decision fusion-based model to aggregate slice level predictions determined by convolutional neural network (CNN) via a majority voting system to evaluate renal masses on CECT. The CNN-based model was trained using 7023 slices with renal masses manually extracted from CECT images of 155 patients, cropped automatically around kidneys, and augmented artificially. We also examined the fully automated approach for renal mass evaluation on CECT. Moreover, a 3D CNN was trained and tested using the same datasets and the obtained results were compared with those acquired from slice-wise algorithms.
resultsFor differentiation of RCC versus benign solid masses, the semi-automated majority voting-based CNN algorithm achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 83.75%, 89.05%, and 91.73% using 160 test cases, respectively. Fully automated pipeline yielded accuracy, precision, and recall of 77.36%, 85.92%, and 87.22% on the same test cases, respectively. 3D CNN reported accuracy, precision, and recall of 79.24%, 90.32%, and 84.21% using 160 test cases, respectively.
conclusionsA semi-automated majority voting CNN-based methodology enabled accurate classification of RCC from benign neoplasms among solid renal masses on CECT. KEY POINTS: • Our proposed semi-automated majority voting CNN-based algorithm achieved accuracy of 83.75% for the diagnosis of RCC from benign solid renal masses on CECT images. • A fully automated CNN-based methodology classified solid renal masses with moderate accuracy of 77.36% using the same test images. • Employing 3D CNN-based methodology yielded slightly lower accuracy for renal mass classification compared with the semi- automated 2D CNN-based algorithm (79.24%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
32350661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.