ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Incidentalomas, SPEW, and VOMIT-radiological dyspepsia?
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental findings are frequent in shoulder CT and MRI scans and increase with age.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Incidental findings on MRI for the evaluation of endometriosis: prevalence and clinical significance.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Focused view CT angiography for selective visualization of stroke related arteries: technical feasibility.European radiology · 2023Article
- Incidental findings in medical imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Incidentalomas in chest CT.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).Insights into imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key points• Incidental findings are an inevitable part of radiology reporting.• Detection of incidental findings may be beneficial, but may result in unnecessary further investigation, and potential harm to patients.• Incidental findings should be reported in context, with an attempt to offer guidance as to their significance, and the need to investigate further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32350659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.