ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2021
Stem-cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a review of clinical outcomes.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Models in Penile Transplantation: Translational Insights and Relevance to Clinical Application.Cureus · 2024Review
- Stem cell therapy in diabetic men with erectile dysfunction: a 24-month follow-up of safety and efficacy of two intracavernous autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells injections, an open label phase 2 clinical trial.Basic and clinical andrology · 2024Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell secretome: A promising therapeutic strategy for erectile dysfunction?Asian journal of urology · 2024Review
- Erectile Dysfunction: Treatments, Advances and New Therapeutic Strategies.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Stem cell therapy and diabetic erectile dysfunction: A critical review.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Canadian Urological Association guideline: Erectile dysfunction.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- Rising public interest in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: an analysis of public perception and a review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
- A review of experimental techniques for erectile function researches and development of medical technology using animal erectile dysfunction models in sexual and reproductive medicine.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
- Recent advances in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.Expert opinion on biological therapyReview
- Human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation could improve diabetic intracavernosal pressure.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) has increased in recent decades. Although many treatments offer some benefits for patients with ED, unmet therapeutic needs remain, and promising new approaches are under investigation. One of these approaches is the use of stem-cell (SC) therapy for ED. We comprehensively reviewed the published literature and ongoing phase 1 and phase 2 trials and identified 27 trials by using SC therapy to treat ED. Of the 27 trials, three have been withdrawn, nine have published results, six are complete but without published results, and nine trials are ongoing or have an "unknown" status. Our analysis revealed that SC therapy represents a promising option to treat ED, although published data exist for less than 100 patients. Large placebo-controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of SC therapy for ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32350455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.