Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350418›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Positive impact of genetic counseling assistants on genetic counseling efficiency, patient volume, and cost in a cancer genetics clinic.

Miranda L G Hallquist, Eric P Tricou, Michael N Hallquist, Juliann M Savatt, Heather Rocha, Alyson E Evans, Nicole Deckard, Yirui Hu, H Lester Kirchner, Josie Pervola and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miranda L G HallquistGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA. mhallquist@geisinger.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8554-2447
Eric P TricouGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Michael N HallquistDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Juliann M SavattGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Heather RochaGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Alyson E EvansGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Nicole DeckardGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Yirui HuGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
H Lester KirchnerGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Josie PervolaGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Alanna Kulchak RahmGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Misha RashkinStanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Tara J SchmidlenGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Marci L B SchwartzGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Janet L WilliamsGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Marc S WilliamsGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Adam H BuchananGeisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Geisinger Medical Center · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer genetics clinics have seen increasing demand, challenging genetic counselors (GCs) to increase efficiency and prompting some clinics to implement genetic counseling assistants (GCAs). To evaluate the impact of GCAs on Geisinger's cancer genetics clinic, we tracked GC time utilization, new patient volume, and clinic cost per patient before and after implementing a GCA program.

methodsGCs used time-tracking software while completing preappointment activities. Electronic health records were reviewed for appointment length and number of patients per week. Internal salary data for GCs and GCAs were used to calculate clinic costs per patient.

resultsTime spent by GCs completing each preappointment activity (21.8 vs. 15.1 minutes) and appointment length (51.6 vs. 44.5 minutes) significantly decreased after GCA program implementation (p values < 0.001). New patients per week per GC significantly increased (7.9 vs. 11.4, p < 0.001). Weekly clinic cost per patient significantly decreased ($233 vs. $176, p = 0.03).

conclusionImplementing a GCA program increased GC efficiency in preappointment activities and clinic appointments, increased patient volume, and decreased clinic cost per patient. Such a program can improve access to GC services and assist GCs in focusing on the direct patient care for which they are specially trained.

Indexed as

CounselorsNeoplasmsCounselingElectronic Health RecordsGenetic CounselingHumansaccesscancer genetic counselinggenetic clinic efficiencygenetic counseling assistantsservice delivery

Identifiers

PMID32350418
OpenAlexW3022069831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.