ArticleScientific reports2020
An information theory approach to biocultural complexity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of biocultural diversity requires the use of appropriate concepts and analytical tools. Particularly, there is a need of indices capable to show the degree of stratification in the set of interactions among cultures and groups of plants and animals in a given region. Here, we present a mathematical approach based on the mutual Shannon information theory to study the relationships among cultural and biological groups. Biocultural complexity was described in terms of effective biocultural units, a new concept defined in this work. From the mathematical formulation of biocultural complexity, formulas were derived to measure the specificity of biological groups and the specialization of cultures, based on the association of human societies with plant or animal groups. To exemplify the concepts and tools, two data sets were analyzed; 1) a set that included artificial data in order to demonstrate the use of the formulas and calculate the indices, and 2) a set that included published data on the use of 18 mushroom species by people in five villages of eastern India. Analysis of the first data set revealed a clear case of biocultural complexity, whereas that of the second set showed that the villages and the use of biological resources composed a single biocultural unit. Overall, hypothesis testing of the association among cultures and biological species was consistent with the information that was provided by the new indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.