Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Bioprospecting of probiotics with antimicrobial activities against Salmonella Heidelberg and that produce B-complex vitamins as potential supplements in poultry nutrition.

Sabrina da Silva Sabo, Maria Anita Mendes, Elias da Silva Araújo, Ligia Bicudo de Almeida Muradian, Edson Naoto Makiyama, Jean Guy LeBlanc, Primavera Borelli, Ricardo Ambrósio Fock, Terezinha Knöbl, Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Activity of Lysozyme Against Multidrug-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distinct gut bacterial composition inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pan-genomic and comparative analysis ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina da Silva SaboDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Anita MendesChemical Engineering Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elias da Silva AraújoDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ligia Bicudo de Almeida MuradianDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edson Naoto MakiyamaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jean Guy LeBlancCERELA-CONICET, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
Primavera BorelliDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Ambrósio FockDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Terezinha KnöblDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo, Brazil, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza OliveiraDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. rpsolive@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-804X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for animal protein for human consumption has been risen exponentially. Modern animal production practices are associated with the regular use of antibiotics, potentially increasing the emerging multi-resistant bacteria, which may have a negative impact on public health. In poultry production, substances capable of maximizing the animals' performance and displaying an antimicrobial activity against pathogens are very well desirable features. Probiotic can be an efficient solution for such a task. In the present work, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from chicken cecum and screened for their antagonistic effect towards many pathogens. Their capacity of producing the B-complex vitamins folate and riboflavin were also evaluated. From 314 isolates, three (C43, C175 and C195) produced Bacteriocin-Like Inhibitory Substances (BLIS) against Staphylococcus aureus (inhibition zones of 18.9, 21.5, 19.5 mm, respectively) and also inhibited the growth of Salmonella Heidelberg. The isolate C43 was identified as Enterococcus faecium, while C173 and C195 were both identified as Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Moreover, the isolates L. lactis subsp. lactis strains C173 and C195 demonstrated high potential to be used as probiotic in poultry feed, in addition to their advantage of producing folate (58.0 and 595.5 ng/mL, respectively) and riboflavin (223.3 and 175.0 ng/mL, respectively).

Indexed as

ChickensAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBioprospectingProbioticsSalmonella entericaVitamin B ComplexAnti-Bacterial AgentsVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID32350311
PMCPMC7190695
OpenAlexW3023372782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.