Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350297›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Markers of tissue damage and inflammation after robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Evelyn Serreyn Lundin, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin, Lena Nilsson, Elvar Theodorsson, Jan Ernerudh, Preben Kjølhede

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Challenge in Acute Care Surgery.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evelyn Serreyn LundinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Evelyn.Lundin@regionostergotland.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-234X
Ninnie Borendal WodlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-7722
Lena NilssonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-9077
Elvar TheodorssonDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-7723
Jan ErnerudhDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical and Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-2044
Preben KjølhedeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-4116
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between women operated with robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in treating early-stage endometrial cancer. At a Swedish university hospital fifty women with early-stage low-risk endometrial cancer were allocated to robotic or abdominal hysterectomy in a randomiszed controlled trial. Blood samples reflecting inflammatory responses (high sensitivity CRP, white blood cells (WBC), thrombocytes, IL-6, cortisol) and tissue damage (creatine kinase (CK), high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1)) were collected one week preoperatively, just before surgery, postoperatively at two, 24 and 48 hours, and one and six weeks postoperatively. High sensitivity CRP (p = 0.03), WBC (p < 0.01), IL-6 (p = 0.03) and CK (p = 0.03) were significantly lower in the robotic group, but fast transitory. Cortisol returned to baseline two hours after robotic hysterectomy but remained elevated in the abdominal group comparable to the preoperative high levels for both groups just before surgery (p < 0.0001). Thrombocytes and HMGB1 were not affected by the mode of surgery. Postoperative inflammatory response and tissue damage were lower after robotic hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy. A significant remaining cortisol elevation two hours after surgery may reflect a higher stress response in the abdominal group.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHMGB1 ProteinHumansHydrocortisoneHysterectomyInflammationInterleukin-6Leukocyte CountMiddle AgedPlatelet CountPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresBiomarkersHMGB1 ProteinHMGB1 protein, humanHydrocortisoneIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID32350297
PMCPMC7190843
OpenAlexW3023377788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.