Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350282›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Inferring spatial and signaling relationships between cells from single cell transcriptomic data.

Zixuan Cang, Qing Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 269 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zixuan CangDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-5586
Qing NieDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. qnie@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-3368

Funding

Multiscale Models of Wound Cell Plasticity for RegenerationU01AR073159 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DAI, XING, NIE, QING · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR073159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides details for individual cells; however, crucial spatial information is often lost. We present SpaOTsc, a method relying on structured optimal transport to recover spatial properties of scRNA-seq data by utilizing spatial measurements of a relatively small number of genes. A spatial metric for individual cells in scRNA-seq data is first established based on a map connecting it with the spatial measurements. The cell-cell communications are then obtained by "optimally transporting" signal senders to target signal receivers in space. Using partial information decomposition, we next compute the intercellular gene-gene information flow to estimate the spatial regulations between genes across cells. Four datasets are employed for cross-validation of spatial gene expression prediction and comparison to known cell-cell communications. SpaOTsc has broader applications, both in integrating non-spatial single-cell measurements with spatial data, and directly in spatial single-cell transcriptomics data to reconstruct spatial cellular dynamics in tissues.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAnimalsCell CommunicationCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticDrosophilaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNASignal TransductionTranscriptomeVisual CortexZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32350282
PMCPMC7190659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.