ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosome architecture and low cohesion bias acrocentric chromosomes towards aneuploidy during mammalian meiosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Maternal genetic variants in kinesin motor domains prematurely increase egg aneuploidy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The Reproductive Lifespan of Ovarian Follicle.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Predicting Infertility: How Genetic Variants in Oocyte Spindle Genes Affect Egg Quality.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2024Review
- Ovarian aging: mechanisms and intervention strategies.Medical review (2021) · 2022Review
- Predicting embryonic aneuploidy rate in IVF patients using whole-exome sequencing.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Selfish centromeres and the wastefulness of human reproduction.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Double paternal uniparental isodisomy 7 and 15 presenting with Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum features.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021Article
- Origins and mechanisms leading to aneuploidy in human eggs.Prenatal diagnosis · 2021Article
- Oocyte aneuploidy-more tools to tackle an old problem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aneuploidy is the leading contributor to pregnancy loss, congenital anomalies, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure in humans. Although most aneuploid conceptions are thought to originate from meiotic division errors in the female germline, quantitative studies that link the observed phenotypes to underlying error mechanisms are lacking. In this study, we developed a mathematical modeling framework to quantify the contribution of different mechanisms of erroneous chromosome segregation to the production of aneuploid eggs. Our model considers the probabilities of all possible chromosome gain/loss outcomes that arise from meiotic errors, such as nondisjunction (NDJ) in meiosis I and meiosis II, and premature separation of sister chromatids (PSSC) and reverse segregation (RS) in meiosis I. To understand the contributions of different meiotic errors, we fit our model to aneuploidy data from 11,157 blastocyst-stage embryos. Our best-fitting model captures several known features of female meiosis, for instance, the maternal age effect on PSSC. More importantly, our model reveals previously undescribed patterns, including an increased frequency of meiosis II errors among eggs affected by errors in meiosis I. This observation suggests that the occurrence of NDJ in meiosis II is associated with the ploidy status of an egg. We further demonstrate that the model can be used to identify IVF patients who produce an extreme number of aneuploid embryos. The dynamic nature of our mathematical model makes it a powerful tool both for understanding the relative contributions of mechanisms of chromosome missegregation in human female meiosis and for predicting the outcomes of assisted reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.