Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350128›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2021

Adverse events in the paediatric emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

Amy C Plint, Antonia Stang, Amanda S Newton, Dale Dalgleish, Mary Aglipay, Nick Barrowman, Sandy Tse, Gina Neto, Ken Farion, Walter David Creery and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amy C PlintCHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada plint@cheo.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-7174
Antonia StangPediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Amanda S NewtonPediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dale DalgleishCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mary AglipaySt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nick BarrowmanCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sandy TseCHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gina NetoCHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ken FarionCHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Walter David CreeryCHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David W JohnsonPediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Terry P KlassenPediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Lisa A CalderEmergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding adverse events among children treated in the emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to improve patient safety by providing evidence of where to focus efforts in a resource-restricted environment.

objectiveTo estimate the risk of adverse events, their type, preventability and severity, for children seen in a paediatric ED.

methodsThis prospective cohort study examined outcomes of patients presenting to a paediatric ED over a 1-year period. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an adverse event (harm to patient related to healthcare received) related to ED care within 3 weeks of their visit. We conducted structured telephone interviews with all patients and families over a 3-week period following their visit to identify flagged outcomes (such as repeat ED visits, worsening symptoms) and screened admitted patients' health records with a validated trigger tool. For patients with flagged outcomes or triggers, three ED physicians independently determined whether an adverse event occurred.

resultsOf 1567 eligible patients, 1367 (87.2%) were enrolled and 1319 (96.5%) reached in follow-up. Median patient age was 4.34 years (IQR 1.5 to 10.57 years) and most (n=1281; 93.7%) were discharged. Among those with follow-up, 33 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.8% to 3.5%) suffered an adverse event related to ED care. None experienced more than one event. Twenty-nine adverse events (87.9%, 95% CI 72.7% to 95.2%) were deemed preventable. The most common types of adverse events (not mutually exclusive) were management issues (51.5%), diagnostic issues (45.5%) and suboptimal follow-up (15.2%).

conclusionOne in 40 children suffered adverse events related to ED care. A high proportion of events were preventable. Management and diagnostic issues warrant further study.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPhysiciansChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPatient DischargePatient SafetyProspective Studiesadverse events, epidemiology and detectionemergency departmentpaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID32350128
PMCPMC7907581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.