Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350089›Full record

SynthesisGut2021

Comprehensive characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with microsatellite instability: histology, molecular pathology and clinical implications.

Claudio Luchini, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Laura D Wood, Deyali Chatterjee, Jae Il Shin, Concetta Sciammarella, Giulia Fiadone, Giuseppe Malleo, Roberto Salvia, Valentyna Kryklyva and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gut, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sotorasib inThe New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Claudio LuchiniDiagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy claudio.luchini@univr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-4908
Lodewijk A A BrosensPathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura D WoodSol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deyali ChatterjeePathology and Immunology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jae Il ShinPediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Concetta SciammarellaDiagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giulia FiadoneDiagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe MalleoGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto SalviaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valentyna KryklyvaPathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-6606
Maria L PireddaDiagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Liang ChengPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Rita T LawlorARC-Net Research Center, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Volkan AdsayPathology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aldo ScarpaARC-Net Research Center and Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-739X
University of Verona · ITRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital Foundation · CAJohns Hopkins University · USKoç University · TRUniversity School · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecently, tumours with microsatellite instability (MSI)/defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have gained considerable interest due to the success of immunotherapy in this molecular setting. Here, we aim to clarify clinical-pathological and/or molecular features of this tumour subgroup through a systematic review coupled with a comparative analysis with existing databases, also providing indications for a correct approach to the clinical identification of MSI/dMMR pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

designPubMed, SCOPUS and Embase were searched for studies reporting data on MSI/dMMR in PDAC up to 30 November 2019. Histological and molecular data of MSI/dMMR PDAC were compared with non-MSI/dMMR PDAC and with PDAC reference cohorts (including SEER database and The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network - TCGA project).

resultsOverall, 34 studies with 8323 patients with PDAC were included in the systematic review. MSI/dMMR demonstrated a very low prevalence in PDAC (around 1%-2%). Compared with conventional PDAC, MSI/dMMR PDAC resulted strongly associated with medullary and mucinous/colloid histology (p<0.01) and with a

conclusionPDAC showing typical medullary or mucinous/colloid histology should be routinely examined for MSI/dMMR status using specific tests (immunohistochemistry, followed by MSI-PCR in cases with doubtful results). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) should be adopted either where there is limited tissue or as part of NGS tumour profiling in the context of precision oncology, acknowledging that conventional histology of PDAC may rarely harbour MSI/dMMR.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDatabases, FactualHumansPancreatic Neoplasmsimmunotherapymicrosatellite instabilitypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID32350089
PMCPMC7211065
OpenAlexW3022265443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.