Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32350017›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians.

Rozemarijn Lidewij van Bruchem-Visser, Gert van Dijk, Francesco Mattace Raso, Inez de Beaufort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rozemarijn Lidewij van Bruchem-VisserInternal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands r.l.visser@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6833-7641
Gert van DijkMedical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Francesco Mattace RasoSection of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Inez de BeaufortMedical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOvertreatment is increasingly seen as a challenge in clinical practice and can lead to unnecessary interventions, poor healthcare outcomes and increasing costs. However, little is known as to what exactly causes overtreatment. In 2015, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to address this problem and distinguished several mechanisms that were thought to drive overtreatment. In 14 qualitative interviews among Dutch physicians, we investigated which mechanisms played a role in decision-making and whether all mechanisms were considered equally important.

designWe asked physicians to present a case from personal experience, in which the patient or family requested continuing treatment against the advice of the physician.

participantsFourteen physicians from five different medical areas agreed to participate.

settingInterviews were held face-to-face at the workplace of the physician.

resultsThree closely related mechanisms were mentioned most frequently as drivers of overtreatment, as perceived by the physician: 'death is not a common topic of conversation', ''never give up' is the default attitude in our society' and 'patients' culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death'. The mechanism 'medical view taking priority' was mentioned to be an inhibitor of overtreatment.

conclusionsOf the 15 mechanisms described by the report of the Steering Committee of the RDMA, not all mechanisms were mentioned as driving overtreatment. Three mechanisms were mentioned most as being a driver of overtreatment ('death is not a common topic of conversation'; ''never give up' is the default attitude in our society'' and 'patients' culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death'), some played no role at all, and others were considered to be inhibitors of overtreatment, especially the mechanism 'medical view taking priority'.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingFamilyMedical FutilityMedical OverusePatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdultAgedAttitude to DeathAttitude to HealthCultureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsgeneral medicine (see internal medicine)health policymedical ethicsqualitative researchquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID32350017
PMCPMC7213846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.