Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349796›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

The ticking clock: does actively making an enhanced care team aware of the passage of time improve pre-hospital scene time following traumatic incidents?

L Curtis, E Ter Avest, J Griggs, J Wiliams, R M Lyon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of advanced pre-hospital interventions on scene time.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. The effect of a clock's presence on trauma resuscitation times in a Dutch level-1 trauma center: a pre-post cohort analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L CurtisAir Ambulance Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5YP, UK. LeighC@aakss.org.uk.
E Ter AvestAir Ambulance Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5YP, UK.
J GriggsAir Ambulance Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5YP, UK.
J WiliamsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
R M LyonAir Ambulance Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5YP, UK.
East Surrey Hospital · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-hospital enhanced care teams like Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are often dispatched to major trauma patients, including patients with traumatic brain injuries and those with major haemorrhage. For these patients, minimizing the time to definitive care is vital. The aim of this study was to determine whether increased awareness of elapsed on scene time produces a relevant time performance improvement for major trauma patients attended by HEMS, and weather introducing such a timer was feasible and acceptable to clinicians.

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of all single casualty traumatic incidents attended by Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex (AAKSS) between 15 October 2016 and 23 May 2017 to test if introduction of a prompting scene timer within the service resulted in a reduction in pre-hospital scene times.

resultsThe majority of the patients attended were male (74%) and sustained blunt trauma (92%). Overall, median scene time was 25.5 [IQR16.3] minutes before introduction of the scene timer and 23.0 [11.0] minutes after introduction, p = 0.13). Scene times for patients with a GCS < 8 and for patients requiring prehospital anaesthesia were significantly lower after introduction of the timer (28 [IQR 14] vs 25 [1], p = 0.017 and 34 [IQR 13] vs 28 [IQR11] minutes, p = 0.007 respectively). The majority of clinicians felt the timer made them more aware of passing time (91%) but that this had not made a difference to scene time (62%) or their practice (57%).

conclusionAudible scene timers may have the potential to reduce pre-hospital scene time for certain single casualty trauma patients treated by a HEMS team, particularly for those patients needing pre-hospital anaesthesia. Regular use of on-scene timers may improve outcomes by reducing time to definitive care for certain subgroups of trauma patients.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAir AmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsWounds, NonpenetratingHEMSPrompting timerScene timeTrauma

Identifiers

PMID32349796
PMCPMC7189533
OpenAlexW3021729273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.