Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349770›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Magnitude and determinants of multimorbidity and health care utilization among patients attending public versus private primary care: a cross-sectional study from Odisha, India.

Sanghamitra Pati, Subhashisa Swain, J André Knottnerus, Job F M Metsemakers, Marjan van den Akker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanghamitra PatiIndian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, ICMR Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751023, India. drsanghamitra12@gmail.com.
Subhashisa SwainSchool of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
J André KnottnerusDepartment of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Job F M MetsemakersDepartment of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjan van den AkkerDepartment of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimorbidity in primary care is a challenge not only for developing countries but also for low and medium income countries (LMIC). Health services in LMIC countries are being provided by both public and private health care providers. However, a critical knowledge gap exists on understanding the true extent of multimorbidity in both types of primary care settings.

methodsWe undertook a study to identify multimorbidity prevalence and healthcare utilization among both public and private primary care attendees in Odisha state of India. A total of 1649 patients attending 40 primary care facilities were interviewed using a structured multimorbidity assessment questionnaire collecting information on 22 chronic diseases, medication use, number of hospitalization and number of outpatient visits.

resultThe overall prevalence of multimorbidity was 28.3% and nearly one third of patients of public facilities and one fourth from private facilities had multimorbidity. Leading diseases among patients visiting public facilities included acid peptic diseases, arthritis and chronic back pain. No significant difference in reporting of hypertension and diabetes across the facilities was seen. Besides age, predictors of multimorbidity among patients attending public facilities were, females [AOR: 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-1.3] and non-aboriginal groups [AOR: 1.6; 95%CI 1.1-2.3] whereas, in private females [AOR: 1.6; 95%CI 1.1-2.4], better socioeconomic conditions [AOR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.1] and higher educational status [primary school completed [AOR 2.6; 95%CI 1.6-4.2] and secondary schooling and above [AOR 2.0; 95%CI 1.1-3.6] with reference to no education were seen to be the determinants of multimorbidity. Increased number of hospital visits to public facilities were higher among lower educational status patients [IRR: 1.57; 95% CI 1.13-2.18] whereas, among private patients, the mean number of hospital visits was 1.70 times more in higher educational status [IRR: 1.70; 95%CI 1.01-3.69]. The mean number of medicines taken per day was higher among patients attending private hospitals.

conclusionOur findings suggest that, multimorbidity is being more reported in public primary care facilities. The pattern and health care utilization in both types of settings are different. A comprehensive care approach must be designed for private care providers.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityAdultChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth care utilizationIndiaMultimorbidityOdishaPrivate primary carePublic primary care

Identifiers

PMID32349770
PMCPMC7191801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.