Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349766›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Publicly available machine learning models for identifying opioid misuse from the clinical notes of hospitalized patients.

Brihat Sharma, Dmitriy Dligach, Kristin Swope, Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar, Niranjan S Karnik, Cara Joyce, Majid Afshar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05745480 (The Evaluation of a Real-time Natural Language Processing Decision Support Tool for Screening Opioid Misuse With Addiction Consult Intervention for Hospitalized Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05745480 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Evaluation of a Real-time Natural Language Processing Decision Support Tool for Screening Opioid Misuse With Addiction Consult Intervention for Hospitalized Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2023 to 2023Enrolled47,502ConditionsOpioid Use Disorder, Opioid MisuseArmsOpioid Misuse Screening with an Addiction Consult Service
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying Opioid Overdose and Opioid Use Disorder and Related Information from Clinical Narratives Using Large Language Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  13. Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brihat SharmaDepartment of Computer Science, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dmitriy DligachDepartment of Computer Science, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kristin SwopeStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
Elizabeth Salisbury-AfsharCenter for Multi-System Solutions to the Opioid Epidemic, American Institute for Research, Chicago, IL, USA.
Niranjan S KarnikDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cara JoyceCenter for Health Outcomes and Informatics Research, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL, 60156, USA.
Majid AfsharCenter for Health Outcomes and Informatics Research, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL, 60156, USA. Majid.afshar@lumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-4652

Funding

The Institute for Translational MedicineUL1TR002389 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Joshua J Jacobs, DAVID O MELTZER · 2017 to 2026
$71.6M
Quantifying How Cocaine Users Respond to Fentanyl Contamination in CocaineUG1DA049467 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Niranjan Subhash Karnik, ANTONIO A MORGAN-LOPEZ · 2019 to 2026
$11.2M
Learning Universal Patient Representations with Hierarchical TransformersR01LM012973 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Timothy A Miller · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Employing eSBI in a Community-based HIV Testing Environment for At-risk YouthR01DA041071 · NIDA · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI GAROFALO, ROBERT, KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
CHANGE OF GRANTEE INSTITUTION 1 K23 AA024503 Alcohol, Burn-Injury, and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeK23AA024503 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AFSHAR, MAJID · 2016 to 2020
$948k
Basic and Clinical Research Training for Medical StudentsT35HL120835 · NHLBI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZELEZNIK-LE, NANCY J · 2015 to 2024
$628k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002389NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL120835NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA024503NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA049467NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated de-identification methods for removing protected health information (PHI) from the source notes of the electronic health record (EHR) rely on building systems to recognize mentions of PHI in text, but they remain inadequate at ensuring perfect PHI removal. As an alternative to relying on de-identification systems, we propose the following solutions: (1) Mapping the corpus of documents to standardized medical vocabulary (concept unique identifier [CUI] codes mapped from the Unified Medical Language System) thus eliminating PHI as inputs to a machine learning model; and (2) training character-based machine learning models that obviate the need for a dictionary containing input words/n-grams. We aim to test the performance of models with and without PHI in a use-case for an opioid misuse classifier.

methodsAn observational cohort sampled from adult hospital inpatient encounters at a health system between 2007 and 2017. A case-control stratified sampling (n = 1000) was performed to build an annotated dataset for a reference standard of cases and non-cases of opioid misuse. Models for training and testing included CUI codes, character-based, and n-gram features. Models applied were machine learning with neural network and logistic regression as well as expert consensus with a rule-based model for opioid misuse. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were compared between models for discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and visual plots measured model fit and calibration.

resultsMachine learning models with CUI codes performed similarly to n-gram models with PHI. The top performing models with AUROCs > 0.90 included CUI codes as inputs to a convolutional neural network, max pooling network, and logistic regression model. The top calibrated models with the best model fit were the CUI-based convolutional neural network and max pooling network. The top weighted CUI codes in logistic regression has the related terms 'Heroin' and 'Victim of abuse'.

conclusionsWe demonstrate good test characteristics for an opioid misuse computable phenotype that is void of any PHI and performs similarly to models that use PHI. Herein we share a PHI-free, trained opioid misuse classifier for other researchers and health systems to use and benchmark to overcome privacy and security concerns.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingAdultElectronic Health RecordsHumansInpatientsMedical RecordsOpioid-Related DisordersUnified Medical Language SystemComputable phenotypeHeroinMachine learningNatural language processingOpioid misuseOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32349766
PMCPMC7191715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.