Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349743›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Pharmacy professionals' experiences and perceptions of providing NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study.

Matt Williams, Abbie Jordan, Jenny Scott, Matthew D Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matt WilliamsDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, 5 West, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-1858
Abbie JordanDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-5574
Jenny ScottDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, 5 West, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-0914
Matthew D JonesDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, 5 West, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. m.d.jones@bath.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-4098
University of Bath · GB

Funding

University of Bath N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient medicines helpline services (PMHS) have been established at some National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, with the aim of providing medicines-related support to patients after they have been discharged. Addressing an important knowledge gap, this qualitative study sought to examine pharmacy professionals' experiences and perceptions of their PMHS, including perceived benefits of the services, and areas for improvement.

methodsInvitations to participate were sent to all NHS Trusts within England that were known to provide a PMHS (n = 117). Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone with 34 pharmacy professionals who provide a PMHS (female = 76%, male = 24%; predominantly from Acute NHS Trusts, 76%). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions (RE-

aimReach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) informed the development of the interview schedule and the analysis of the data using framework analysis.

resultsTwo themes were generated from the analysis: Resources, and Perceived benefits. Findings illustrate how providing a PMHS with limited resources (e.g., no specific funding, understaffed) negatively impacts the implementation, maintenance and reach of PMHS, and the ability to evidence their effectiveness. Despite operating with limited resources, PMHS are considered to have many benefits for patients and healthcare organisations (e.g., providing a 'safety net' to patients during the transfer of care period, providing reassurance to patients, helping to optimise patients' medicines, resolving medicines-related errors, reducing the burden upon other services, and providing the potential to improve hospital services based upon the content of enquiries). However, actually establishing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PMHS is challenging due to perceived logistical difficulties of collecting data, and the difficulty measuring hard outcomes (e.g., prevention of readmissions).

conclusionsPMHS are typically perceived to be under-resourced, although they are considered by pharmacy professionals to have several benefits for service users and NHS Trusts. For those sites that provide a PMHS, we recommend using enquiry data to improve hospital services, and to share ideas for implementing and maintaining a PMHS within a resource-limited context. High-quality research is needed to evidence the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PMHS, which may help to secure adequate resources for this service in the future.

Indexed as

HotlinesPharmaceutical ServicesState MedicineAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsQualitative ResearchDrug informationFramework analysisHospital dischargeHospital pharmacyMedication errorsMedicines informationNational Health ServicePatient medicines helplinesQualitativeRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID32349743
PMCPMC7189450
OpenAlexW3022873732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.