Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349728›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Barriers and facilitators to retaining a cohort of street-based cisgender female sex workers recruited in Baltimore, Maryland, USA: results from the SAPPHIRE study.

Bradley E Silberzahn, Miles B Morris, Katelyn E Riegger, Rebecca Hamilton White, Catherine A Tomko, Ju Nyeong Park, Katherine H A Footer, Steven S Huettner, Susan G Sherman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health inequities faced by sex workers.The Lancet. Public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. HIV-Associated Genital Immune Biomarkers in the Female Sex Worker Population: A Pilot Study.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley E SilberzahnJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Bsilber5@jhu.edu.
Miles B MorrisJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Katelyn E RieggerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Rebecca Hamilton WhiteJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Catherine A TomkoJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ju Nyeong ParkJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Katherine H A FooterJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Steven S HuettnerDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Susan G ShermanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
The HIV risk environment of high-risk women: Interaction with public safetyR01DA038499 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, SUSAN G. · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research 1P30AI094189NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038499NIDA NIH HHS R01DA038499-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite experiencing HIV/STIs, violence, and other morbidities at higher rates than the general public, street-based female sex workers are often absent from public health research and surveillance due to the difficulty and high costs associated with engagement and retention. The current study builds on existing literature by examining barriers and facilitators of retaining a street-based cohort of cisgender female sex workers recruited in a mobile setting in Baltimore, Maryland who participated in the SAPPHIRE study. Participants completed interviews and sexual health testing at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months.

methodsRetention strategies are described and discussed in light of their benefits and challenges. Strategies included collecting several forms of participant contact information, maintaining an extensive field presence by data collectors, conducting social media outreach and public record searches, and providing cash and non-cash incentives. We also calculated raw and adjusted retention proportions at each follow-up period. Lastly, baseline sample characteristics were compared by number of completed visits across demographic, structural vulnerabilities, work environment, and substance use variables using F-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests.

resultsAlthough there were drawbacks to each retention strategy, each method was useful in tandem in achieving a successful follow-up rate. While direct forms of contact such as phone calls, social media outreach, and email were useful for retaining more stable participants, less stable participants required extensive field-based efforts such as home and site visits that increase the likelihood of random encounters. Overall, adjusted retention exceeded 70% for the duration of the 12-month study. Participants who were younger, recently experienced homelessness, and injected drugs daily were less likely to have completed all or most follow-up visits.

conclusionRetention of street-based female sex workers required the simultaneous use of diverse retention strategies that were tailored to participant characteristics. With familiarity of the dynamic nature of the study population characteristics, resources can be appropriately allocated to strategies most likely to result in successful retention.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilitySex WorkersAdultBaltimoreCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPatient SelectionSexually Transmitted DiseasesFemale sex workerHuman immunodeficiency virusRetentionSexually transmitted infectionSex work

Identifiers

PMID32349728
PMCPMC7191822
OpenAlexW3023675072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.