Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349665›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Organic mulching positively regulates the soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions in tea plantation.

Shuning Zhang, Yu Wang, Litao Sun, Chen Qiu, Yiqian Ding, Honglian Gu, Linjun Wang, Zhaoshun Wang, Zhaotang Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of an Isolate ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuning ZhangTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Yu WangTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Litao SunTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Chen QiuTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Yiqian DingTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Honglian GuTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China.
Linjun WangWeihai agricultural and rural affairs service center, Weihai, 264200, Shandong, China.
Zhaoshun WangWeihai agricultural and rural affairs service center, Weihai, 264200, Shandong, China.
Zhaotang DingTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China. dzttea@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-3038

Funding

Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong (CN) 2019LYXZ009Livelihood Project of Qingdao City 19-6-1-64-nshProject of Agricultural Science and Technology Fund in Shandong Province 2019LY002, 2019YQ010Significant Application Projects of Agriculture Technology Innovation in Shandong Province SD2019ZZ010Special Foundation for Distinguished Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province No.ts201712057Technology System of Modern Agricultural Industry in Shandong Province SDAIT-19-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent mulches have variable effects on soil physicochemical characteristics, bacterial and fungal communities and ecosystem functions. However, the information about soil microbial diversity, community structure and ecosystem function in tea plantation under different mulching patterns was limited. In this study, we investigated bacterial and fungal communities of tea plantation soils under polyethylene film and peanut hull mulching using high-throughput 16S rRNA and ITS rDNA gene Illumina sequencing.

resultsThe results showed that the dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi, and the dominant fungal phyla were Ascomycota, Mortierellomycota and Basidiomycota in all samples, but different mulching patterns affected the distribution of microbial communities. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Nitrospirae in peanut hull mulching soils (3.24%) was significantly higher than that in polyethylene film mulching soils (1.21%) in bacterial communities, and the relative abundances of Mortierellomycota and Basidiomycota in peanut hull mulching soils (33.72, 21.93%) was significantly higher than that in polyethylene film mulching soils (14.88, 6.53%) in fungal communities. Peanut hull mulching increased the diversity of fungal communities in 0-20 cm soils and the diversity of bacterial communities in 20-40 cm soils. At the microbial functional level, there was an enrichment of bacterial functional features, including amino acid transport and metabolism and energy production and conversion, and there was an enrichment of fungal functional features, including undefined saprotrophs, plant pathogens and soils aprotrophs.

conclusionsUnique distributions of bacterial and fungal communities were observed in soils under organic mulching. Thus, we believe that the organic mulching has a positive regulatory effect on the soil bacterial and fungal communities and ecosystem functions, and so, is more suitable for tea plantation.

Indexed as

BacteriaCrops, AgriculturalDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobial ConsortiaMycobiomePhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoilSoil MicrobiologyTeaDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilTeaBacterial and fungal communitiesCamellia sinensis (L.) O. KuntzeMulchTea plantation soil

Identifiers

PMID32349665
PMCPMC7191807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.