ReviewMicromachines2020
A Review of Passive Micromixers with a Comparative Analysis.
Review in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-speed photoacoustic laser streaming and on-demand fluid mixing in a microfluidic chip with carbon nanotube-based elastomers.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Comparative numerical and experimental evaluation of 3D-printed micromixers for biotechnological applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diffusion-Controlled Nucleation, Growth, and Self-Assembly of Silica Nanoparticles in Laminar Microfluidic Flow.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- A Plug-and-Play Volume Minimizing Micromixer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip System with Integrated Fluidic Breakers and Phaseguide Fluid Structures for Optimal Passive Mixing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in computational studies for lipid nanoparticle development.npj drug discovery · 2025Review
- From Micro to Marvel: Unleashing the Full Potential of Click Chemistry with Micromachine Integration.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Performance analysis of three-dimensional passive micromixers using k-means priority clustering with AHP-based sustainable design optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design and Analysis of a Passive Micromixer Based on Multiple Passages.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Analysis of Entropy Generation for Mass and Thermal Mixing Behaviors in Non-Newtonian Nano-Fluids of a Crossing Micromixer.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Consistent Evaluation Methods for Microfluidic Mixers.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Characterization of the oil water two phase flow in a novel microchannel contactor equipped with helical wire static mixer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Inertial microfluidic mixer for biological CubeSat missions.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Tailored micromixing in chemically patterned microchannels undergoing electromagnetohydrodynamic flow.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Design and Mixing Analysis of a Passive Micromixer with Circulation Promoters.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Mixing Performance of a Passive Micromixer Based on Split-to-Circulate (STC) Flow Characteristics.Micromachines · 2024Article
- A Review of Pressure Drop and Mixing Characteristics in Passive Mixers Involving Miscible Liquids.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Enhanced mixing efficiency and reduced droplet size with novel droplet generators.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A TeZla micromixer for interrogating the early and broad folding landscape of G-quadruplex via multistage velocity descending.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Design Optimization Method for Large-Size Sidewall-Driven Micromixer to Generate Powerful Swirling Flow.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wide range of existing passive micromixers are reviewed, and quantitative analyses of ten typical passive micromixers were performed to compare their mixing indices, pressure drops, and mixing costs under the same axial length and flow conditions across a wide Reynolds number range of 0.01-120. The tested micromixers were selected from five types of micromixer designs. The analyses of flow and mixing were performed using continuity, Navier-Stokes and convection-diffusion equations. The results of the comparative analysis were presented for three different Reynolds number ranges: low-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.