ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020
Faecal Microbiota Analysis of Piglets During Lactation.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intestinal microbiota dynamics in piglets: the interplay with swine enteric coronavirus infections and implications for disease control.Animal microbiome · 2025Review
- Impact of Parenteral Ceftiofur on Developmental Dynamics of Early Life Fecal Microbiota and Antibiotic Resistome in Neonatal Lambs.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur.Veterinary research · 2023Article
- Characterization of the fecal microbiota of Pampa Rocha pigs, a genetic resource endemic to eastern Uruguay.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Exposure to maternal feces in lactation influences piglet enteric microbiota, growth, and survival preweaning.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- A Single Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Altered the Microbiota of Weaned Pigs.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial use in animals and the potential development of antimicrobial resistance is a global concern. So, non-antimicrobial techniques for animal disease control are needed. This study aimed to determine whether neonatal ceftiofur (CF) treatment affects piglet faecal microbiomes and whether faecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) can correct it. Two focal piglets per sow were assigned to treatments as follows: cffresh (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.