Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349405›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

On the Assessment of Surface Quality and Productivity Aspects in Precision Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Alloy: Relative Performance of Wiper vs. Conventional Inserts.

Adel T Abbas, Magdy M El Rayes, Monis Luqman, Noha Naeim, Hussien Hegab, Ahmed Elkaseer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Adel T AbbasMechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, P.O. Box 800, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-024X
Magdy M El RayesMechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, P.O. Box 800, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4233-6314
Monis LuqmanMechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, P.O. Box 800, Saudi Arabia.
Noha NaeimDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Port Said University, Port Fuad 42526, Egypt.
Hussien HegabMechanical Design and Production Engineering Department, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.
Ahmed ElkaseerDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Port Said University, Port Fuad 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2500-3617
King Saud University · SACairo University · EGKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEPort Said University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports an experimental assessment of surface quality generated in the precision turning of AISI 4340 steel alloy using conventional round and wiper nose inserts for different cutting conditions. A three-factor (each at 4 levels) full factorial design of experiment was followed for feed rate, cutting speed, and depth of cut, with resulting machined surface quality characterized by resulting average roughness (Ra). The results show that, for the provided range of cutting conditions, lower surface roughness values were obtained using wiper inserts compared with conventional inserts, indicating a superior performance. When including the type of insert as a qualitative factor, ANOVA revealed that the type of insert was most important in determining surface roughness and material removal rate, with feed rate as the second most significant, followed by the interaction of feed rate and type of insert. It was found that using wiper inserts allowed simultaneous increases in feed rate, cutting speed, and depth of cut, while providing better surface quality of lower Ra, compared to the global minimum value that could be achieved using the conventional insert. These findings show that wiper inserts produce better surface quality and a material removal rate up to ten times higher than that obtained with conventional inserts. This clearly indicates the tremendous advantages of high surface quality and productivity that wiper inserts can offer when compared with the conventional round nose type in precision hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel.

Indexed as

AISI 4340 alloy steelconventional round nose insertprecision hard turningproductivityroughnesswiper insert

Identifiers

PMID32349405
PMCPMC7254342
OpenAlexW3018317526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.