Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349366›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Site-Specific Effects of Online rTMS during a Working Memory Task in Healthy Older Adults.

Lysianne Beynel, Simon W Davis, Courtney A Crowell, Moritz Dannhauer, Wesley Lim, Hannah Palmer, Susan A Hilbig, Alexandra Brito, Connor Hile, Bruce Luber and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lysianne BeynelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Simon W DavisDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, 3116 N Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704, USA.
Courtney A CrowellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Moritz DannhauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Wesley LimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Hannah PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Susan A HilbigDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Alexandra BritoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Connor HileDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Bruce LuberNational Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
Sarah H LisanbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Angel V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, 308 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Unit (NNU)ZIAMH002955 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2016 to 2025
$40.3M
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults - Administrative SupplementU01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adultsR01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2015 to 2015
$497k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of manipulating information within working memory is central to many cognitive functions, but also declines rapidly in old age. Improving this process could markedly enhance the health-span in older adults. The current pre-registered, randomized and placebo-controlled study tested the potential of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied at 5 Hz over the left lateral parietal cortex to enhance working memory manipulation in healthy elderly adults. rTMS was applied, while participants performed a delayed-response alphabetization task with two individually titrated levels of difficulty. Coil placement and stimulation amplitude were calculated from fMRI activation maps combined with electric field modeling on an individual-subject basis in order to standardize dosing at the targeted cortical location. Contrary to the a priori hypothesis, active rTMS significantly decreased accuracy relative to sham, and only in the hardest difficulty level. When compared to the results from our previous study, in which rTMS was applied over the left prefrontal cortex, we found equivalent effect sizes but opposite directionality suggesting a site-specific effect of rTMS. These results demonstrate engagement of cortical working memory processing using a novel TMS targeting approach, while also providing prescriptions for future studies seeking to enhance memory through rTMS.

Indexed as

agingelectric field modelingfMRIrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32349366
PMCPMC7287855
OpenAlexW3018737426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.