Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349215›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Calculating Protein Content of Expressed Breast Milk to Optimize Protein Supplementation in Very Low Birth Weight Infants with Minimal Effort-A Secondary Analysis.

Michaela Minarski, Christoph Maas, Corinna Engel, Christine Heinrich, Katrin Böckmann, Wolfgang Bernhard, Christian F Poets, Axel R Franz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing Early Neonatal Nutrition and Dietary Pattern in Premature Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michaela MinarskiDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Christoph MaasDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Corinna EngelCenter for Pediatric Clinical Studies, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Christine HeinrichDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Katrin BöckmannDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Wolfgang BernhardDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-223X
Christian F PoetsDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1072-0066
Axel R FranzDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-0857
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

Medical Faculty of Tuebingen University E.05.00062Nestlé Nutrition, Frankfurt, Germany D.30.14150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast milk does not meet the nutritional needs of preterm infants, necessitating fortification. Breast milk is particularly variable in protein content, hence standardized (fixed dosage) supplementation results in inadequate supply. This was a secondary analysis of 589 breast milk protein content measurements of 51 mothers determined by mid-infrared spectroscopy during a clinical trial of higher versus lower protein supplementation in very low birth weight infants. Mothers (and breast milk samples) were divided into a test (41 mothers) and a validation cohort (10 mothers). In the test cohort, the decrease in protein content by day of lactation was modeled resulting in the breast milk-equation (BME)). In the validation cohort, five supplementation strategies to optimize protein supply were compared: standardized supplementation (adding 1.0 g (S1) or 1.42 g protein/100 mL (S2)) was compared with 'adapted' supplementation, considering variation in protein content (protein content according to Gidrewicz and Fenton (A1), to BME (A2) and to BME with adjustments at days 12 and 26 (A3)). S1 and S2 achieved 5% and 24% of adequate protein supply, while the corresponding values for A1-A3 were 89%, 96% and 95%. Adapted protein supplementation based on calculated breast milk protein content is easy, non-invasive, inexpensive and improves protein supply compared to standardized supplementation.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightAdultCohort StudiesDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLactationMilk, HumanMilk ProteinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultDietary ProteinsMilk Proteinsbreast milkenteral feedingindividual fortificationinfantnutritionprematureprotein supplyvery low birth weight infant

Identifiers

PMID32349215
PMCPMC7282015
OpenAlexW3019985256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.