Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349142›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2020

Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices.

Thankam Paul Thyvalikakath, William D Duncan, Zasim Siddiqui, Michelle LaPradd, George Eckert, Titus Schleyer, Donald Brad Rindal, Mark Jurkovich, Tracy Shea, Gregg H Gilbert and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nutritional Assessment of Denture Wearers Using Matched Electronic Dental-Health Record Data.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dental Recordkeeping: Practice in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2021
    Article
  18. Addressing Knowledge Gaps.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Thankam Paul ThyvalikakathDental Informatics Core, Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry & Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
William D DuncanEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States.
Zasim SiddiquiDental Informatics Core, Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry & Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Michelle LaPraddDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
George EckertDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Titus SchleyerCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Donald Brad RindalHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Mark JurkovichHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Tracy SheaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Gregg H GilbertDepartment of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
HealthPartners · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USRegenstrief Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
The National Dental PBRN - Administrative CoreU19DE028717 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2019 to 2025
$23.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE028717U19-DE-22516 National Institutes of HealthU19-DE-28717 National Institutes of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR).

methodsNinety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location.

resultsEighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset.

conclusionThis study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice.

Indexed as

DentistryElectronic Health RecordsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolData MiningFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32349142
PMCPMC7190390
OpenAlexW3019417524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.