Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32349119›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2020

Clinical, behavioral, and neural measures of reward processing correlate with escitalopram response in depression: a Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) Report.

Katharine Dunlop, Sakina J Rizvi, Sidney H Kennedy, Stefanie Hassel, Stephen C Strother, Jacqueline K Harris, Mojdeh Zamyadi, Stephen R Arnott, Andrew D Davis, Farrokh Mansouri and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01655706 phase3completednot on this map

Integrated Biological Markers for the Prediction of Treatment Response in Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2012 to 2017Enrolled211ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsescitalopram, aripiprazole
NCT05017311 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Optimized Predictive Treatment In Medications for Unipolar Major Depression (OPTIMUM-D)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Scotia Health AuthorityRan2023 to 2029Enrolled400ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsEscitalopram, Brexpiprazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Role of the Serotonergic System in Time Perception: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Acute Neurofunctional Effects of Escitalopram in Pediatric Anxiety: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  19. Neuroimaging for precision medicine in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine DunlopDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. kad2032@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-7692
Sakina J RizviInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sidney H KennedyInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefanie HasselDepartment of Psychiatry and the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Stephen C StrotherRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-217X
Jacqueline K HarrisDepartment of Computer Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mojdeh ZamyadiRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen R ArnottRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew D DavisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6078-0163
Farrokh MansouriInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-4971
Laura SchulzeInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amanda K CenitiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Raymond W LamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-4669
Roumen MilevDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Susan RotzingerASR Suicide and Depression Studies Unit, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jane A FosterCentre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Benicio N FreyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8267-943X
Sagar V ParikhDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Claudio N SoaresDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Rudolf UherDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Gustavo TureckiDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-2736
Glenda M MacQueenDepartment of Psychiatry and the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jonathan DownarInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-174X
St. Michael's Hospital · CABaycrest Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACornell University · USDalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CAProvidence Health Care · CAQueen's University · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anhedonia is thought to reflect deficits in reward processing that are associated with abnormal activity in mesocorticolimbic brain regions. It is expressed clinically as a deficit in the interest or pleasure in daily activities. More severe anhedonia in major depressive disorder (MDD) is a negative predictor of antidepressant response. It is unknown, however, whether the pathophysiology of anhedonia represents a viable avenue for identifying biological markers of antidepressant treatment response. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the relationships between reward processing and response to antidepressant treatment using clinical, behavioral, and functional neuroimaging measures. Eighty-seven participants in the first Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) protocol received 8 weeks of open-label escitalopram. Clinical correlates of reward processing were assessed at baseline using validated scales to measure anhedonia, and a monetary incentive delay (MID) task during functional neuroimaging was completed at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment. Response to escitalopram was associated with significantly lower self-reported deficits in reward processing at baseline. Activity during the reward anticipation, but not the reward consumption, phase of the MID task was correlated with clinical response to escitalopram at week 8. Early (baseline to week 2) increases in frontostriatal connectivity during reward anticipation significantly correlated with reduction in depressive symptoms after 8 weeks of treatment. Escitalopram response is associated with clinical and neuroimaging correlates of reward processing. These results represent an important contribution towards identifying and integrating biological, behavioral, and clinical correlates of treatment response. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01655706.

Indexed as

CitalopramMajor Depressive DisorderAnhedoniaBiomarkersCanadaDepressionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardBiomarkersCitalopram

Identifiers

PMID32349119
PMCPMC7297974
OpenAlexW3019972981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.