ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Electroosmosis Dominates Electrophoresis of Antibiotic Transport Across the Outer Membrane Porin F.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vectorial Discrimination of Small Molecules with a Macrocycle Adaptor-Protein Nanopore System and Nanocavity-Dependent, pH Gradient-Controlled Analyte Kinetics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Controlling DNA Fragments Translocation across Nanopores with the Synergic Use of Site-Directed Mutagenesis, pH-Dependent Charge Tuning, and Electroosmotic Flow.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Outer Membrane Porins Contribute to Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Foam-Based Electrophoretic Separation of Charged Dyes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022Article
- The C2 entity of chitosugars is crucial in molecular selectivity of the Vibrio campbellii chitoporin.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report that the dynamics of antibiotic capture and transport across a voltage-biased OmpF nanopore is dominated by the electroosmotic flow rather than the electrophoretic force. By reconstituting an OmpF porin in an artificial lipid bilayer and applying an electric field across it, we are able to elucidate the permeation of molecules and their mechanism of transport. This field gives rise to an electrophoretic force acting directly on a charged substrate but also indirectly via coupling to all other mobile ions, causing an electroosmotic flow. The directionality and magnitude of this flow depends on the selectivity of the channel. Modifying the charge state of three different substrates (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and enoxacin) by varying the pH between 6 and 9 while the charge and selectivity of OmpF is conserved allows us to work under conditions in which electroosmotic flow and electrophoretic forces add or oppose. This configuration allows us to identify and distinguish the contributions of the electroosmotic flow and the electrophoretic force on translocation. Statistical analysis of the resolvable dwell times reveals rich kinetic details regarding the direction and the stochastic movement of antibiotics inside the nanopore. We quantitatively describe the electroosmotic velocity component experienced by the substrates and their diffusion coefficients inside the porin with an estimate of the energy barrier experienced by the molecules caused by the interaction with the channel wall, which slows down the permeation by several orders of magnitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.