Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32348460›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

A reformulation of pLSA for uncertainty estimation and hypothesis testing in bio-imaging.

P D Tar, N A Thacker, S Deepaisarn, J P B O'Connor, A W McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P D TarDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences.
N A ThackerDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences.
S DeepaisarnDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences.
J P B O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, M13 9PG Manchester, UK.
A W McMahonDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProbabilistic latent semantic analysis (pLSA) is commonly applied to describe mass spectra (MS) images. However, the method does not provide certain outputs necessary for the quantitative scientific interpretation of data. In particular, it lacks assessment of statistical uncertainty and the ability to perform hypothesis testing. We show how linear Poisson modelling advances pLSA, giving covariances on model parameters and supporting χ2 testing for the presence/absence of MS signal components. As an example, this is useful for the identification of pathology in MALDI biological samples. We also show potential wider applicability, beyond MS, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from colorectal xenograft models.

resultsSimulations and MALDI spectra of a stroke-damaged rat brain show MS signals from pathological tissue can be quantified. MRI diffusion data of control and radiotherapy-treated tumours further show high sensitivity hypothesis testing for treatment effects. Successful χ2 and degrees-of-freedom are computed, allowing null-hypothesis thresholding at high levels of confidence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Open-source image analysis software available from TINA Vision, www.tina-vision.net. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAnimalsDiffusionLatent Class AnalysisRatsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID32348460
PMCPMC7332574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.