Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32348305›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Dietary and Biological Assessment of the Omega-3 Status of Collegiate Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Peter P Ritz, Mark B Rogers, Jennifer S Zabinsky, Valisa E Hedrick, John A Rockwell, Ernest G Rimer, Samantha B Kostelnik, Matthew W Hulver, Michelle S Rockwell

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter P RitzAthletics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Mark B RogersAthletics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Jennifer S ZabinskyAthletics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Valisa E HedrickDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
John A RockwellDepartment of Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States of America.
Ernest G RimerDepartment of Exercise & Sport Science, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Samantha B KostelnikDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Matthew W HulverDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Michelle S RockwellDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7910-6083
Virginia Tech · USBiomedical Research Institute · USCarilion Clinic · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3 FA) are associated with cardiovascular health, brain function, reduction of inflammation, and several other physiological roles of importance to competitive athletes. The ω-3 FA status of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes has not been well-described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ω-3 FA status of NCAA Division I athletes using dietary and biological assessment methodology. Athletes from nine NCAA Division I institutions from throughout the U.S. (n = 1,528, 51% male, 34 sports represented, 19.9 ± 1.4 years of age) completed a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess ω-3 FA from diet and supplements. Omega-3 Index (O3i) was evaluated in a sub-set of these participants (n = 298, 55% male, 21 sports represented, 20.0 ± 1.3 years of age) using dried blood spot sampling. Only 6% (n = 93) of athletes achieved the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics' recommendation to consume 500 mg DHA+EPA per day. Use of ω-3 FA supplements was reported by 15% (n = 229) of participants. O3i was 4.33 ± 0.81%, with no participants meeting the O3i benchmark of 8% associated with the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease. Every additional weekly serving of fish or seafood was associated with an absolute O3i increase of 0.27%. Overall, sub-optimal ω-3 FA status was observed among a large, geographically diverse group of male and female NCAA Division I athletes. These findings may inform interventions aimed at improving ω-3 FA status of collegiate athletes. Further research on athlete-specific ω-3 FA requirements is needed.

Indexed as

AthletesDietUniversitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleFish ProductsHumansMaleSeafoodYoung AdultFatty Acids, Omega-3

Identifiers

PMID32348305
PMCPMC7190167
OpenAlexW2983274306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.