Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347815›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

The Development and Evaluation of a Text Message Program to Prevent Perceived Insufficient Milk Among First-Time Mothers: Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jill R Demirci, Brian Suffoletto, Jack Doman, Melissa Glasser, Judy C Chang, Susan M Sereika, Debra L Bogen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02724969 (A Mobile, Semi-automated Text Message-based Intervention to Prevent Perceived Low or Insufficient Milk Supply), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02724969 nacompletednot on this map

A Mobile, Semi-automated Text Message-based Intervention to Prevent Perceived Low or Insufficient Milk Supply

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2017 to 2019Enrolled250ConditionsBreast FeedingArmsMILK or Text4Baby text message intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Biomarker-based text messages to promote lactation success in mothers of critically Ill infants: a randomized controlled pilot study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill R DemirciDepartment of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-7849
Brian SuffolettoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9628-5260
Jack DomanOffice of Academic Computing, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-3004
Melissa GlasserDepartment of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9857-3576
Judy C ChangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, and Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-3798
Susan M SereikaDepartment of Health & Community Systems, Center for Research and Evaluation, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-1352
Debra L BogenDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-1910
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Preventing Perceived Insufficient Milk: Development of a Text Message-Based InterR00NR015106 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEMIRCI, JILL RADTKE · 2016 to 2018
$719k
NINR NIH HHS R00 NR015106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral recent trials have examined the feasibility and efficacy of automated SMS text messaging to provide remote breastfeeding support to mothers, but these texting systems vary in terms of design features and outcomes examined.

objectiveThis study examined user engagement with and feedback on a theory-grounded SMS text messaging intervention intended to prevent perceived insufficient milk (PIM)-the single, leading modifiable cause of unintended breastfeeding reduction and cessation.

methodsWe recruited 250 nulliparous individuals intending to breastfeed between 13 and 25 weeks of pregnancy in southwestern Pennsylvania. Participants were randomly assigned with equal allocation to either an SMS intervention to prevent PIM and unintended breastfeeding reduction or cessation (MILK, a Mobile, semiautomated text message-based Intervention to prevent perceived Low or insufficient milK supply; n=126) or a control group receiving general perinatal SMS text messaging-based support via the national, free Text4Baby system (n=124). Participants in both groups received SMS text messages 3 to 7 times per week from 25 weeks of pregnancy to 8 weeks postpartum. The MILK intervention incorporated several automated interactivity and personalization features (eg, keyword texting for more detailed information on topics and branched response logic) as well as an option to receive one-on-one assistance from an on-call study lactation consultant. We examined participant interactions with the MILK system, including response rates to SMS text messaging queries. We also sought participant feedback on MILK content, delivery preferences, and overall satisfaction with the system via interviews and a remote survey at 8 weeks postpartum.

resultsParticipants randomized to MILK (87/124, 70.2% white and 84/124, 67.7% college educated) reported that MILK texts increased their breastfeeding confidence and helped them persevere through breastfeeding problems. Of 124 participants, 9 (7.3%) elected to stop MILK messages, and 3 (2.4%) opted to reduce message frequency during the course of the study. There were 46 texts through the MILK system for individualized assistance from the study lactation consultant (25/46, 54% on weekends or after-hours). The most commonly texted keywords for more detailed information occurred during weeks 4 to 6 postpartum and addressed milk volume intake and breastfeeding and sleep patterns. MILK participants stated a preference for anticipatory guidance on potential breastfeeding issues and less content addressing the benefits of breastfeeding. Suggested improvements included extending messaging past 8 weeks, providing access to messaging for partners, and tailoring content based on participants' pre-existing breastfeeding knowledge and unique breastfeeding trajectory.

conclusionsPrenatal and postpartum evidence-based breastfeeding support delivered via semiautomated SMS text messaging is a feasible and an acceptable intervention for first-time mothers. To optimize engagement with digital breastfeeding interventions, enhanced customization features should be considered.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724969; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02724969.

Indexed as

Text MessagingFemaleHumansMothersPennsylvaniaPostnatal CarePregnancyRetrospective Studiesbreast feedingcell phonemHealthmobile phoneperceived insufficient milkrandomized controlled trialshort message servicetelemedicinetext messaging

Identifiers

PMID32347815
PMCPMC7221632
OpenAlexW3019773736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.