Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020
Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical trial in children aged 6-35 months in China.
Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03859141 (Open Phase I and Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects Aged 6-35 Months), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Open Phase I and Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects Aged 6-35 Months
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological non-inferiority and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine versus two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in China: Results from two studies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Trial
- Safety Profiles of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of Five Clinical Studies.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Mapping Pediatric Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity Evidence: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Article
- The biology of the avian influenza virus: A comprehensive review with insights into novel therapeutic strategies.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Self-Assembling Nanoparticle Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccines Induce High Antibody Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine compared with the trivalent vaccine for influenza infection: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Review
- A Comparison of Etiology, Pathogenesis, Vaccinal and Antiviral Drug Development between Influenza and COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Opposing Effects of Prior Infection versus Prior Vaccination on Vaccine Immunogenicity against Influenza A(H3N2) Viruses.Viruses · 2022Article
- Analysis of the adverse events following immunization with inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine from 2018 to 2020 in Zhejiang province, with a comparison to trivalent influenza vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Advances in Development and Application of Influenza Vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mismatch between circulating influenza B viruses and vaccine strains occurs frequently. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical study, healthy children aged 6-35 months were randomized into three groups at a ratio of 2:1:1, received two doses of quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) or licensed trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs). The primary objective was to evaluate the non-inferiority immunogenicity of QIV compared with the two TIVs, containing B/Victoria or B/Yamagata strain. Safety information was collected for 28 days after each vaccination. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were monitored for 6 months after the second vaccination. A total of 2146 subjects (QIV: 1069, TIV-Vic: 540, TIV-Yam: 537) were enrolled in this study. QIV was found non-inferior to TIVs for shared strains (A/H1N1 and A/H3N2) and corresponding BY strain based on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies 28 days after the second dose of vaccination. The resulted geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios (QIV/TIV) were 0.98 (0.89, 1.07) for H1N1, 0.95 (0.85, 1.05) for H3N2 and 0.89 (0.81, 0.98) for BY. And the seroconversion rate differences (QIV-TIV) were -0.46% (-3.24%, 2.31%) for H1N1, -1.95% (-5.54%, 1.65%) for H3N2 and -3.58% (-8.11%, 0.95%) for BY. The BV strain in QIV did not reach the non-inferiority criteria, with GMT of 1:52.25 (vs. 1:61.02 of TIV-Vic) and seroconversion rate of 59.49% (vs. 66.85% of TIV-Vic). No increased safety concerns occurred in QIV group. Candidate QIV can provide good protection for children aged 6 to 35 months, and its immunogenicity and safety were proved. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03859141.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.