Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347778›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

A phase Ⅱ, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine.

Rong Tang, Guifan Li, Chengfu Zhang, Hengkui Zhi, Jiahong Zhu, Jianjun Wang, Qi Liang, Yuemei Hu, Changgui Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rong TangDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Public Health Research Institute of Jiangsu Province) , Jiangsu, China.
Guifan LiDepartment of Registration, Beijing Minhai Biotechnology Co. Ltd , Beijing, China.
Chengfu ZhangDepartment of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Lianshui County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Lianshui, Jiangsu, China.
Hengkui ZhiDepartment of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Dafeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Dafeng, Jiangsu, China.
Jiahong ZhuDepartment of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Lianshui County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Lianshui, Jiangsu, China.
Jianjun WangDepartment of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Dafeng County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Dafeng, Jiangsu, China.
Qi LiangDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Public Health Research Institute of Jiangsu Province) , Jiangsu, China.
Yuemei HuDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Public Health Research Institute of Jiangsu Province) , Jiangsu, China.
Changgui LiDivision of Respiratory Virus Vaccines, National Institute for Food and Drug Control , Beijing, China.
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase Ⅱ, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a various Sabin IPV preparations. Six hundred infants aged 60 ~ 90 days received one of five different vaccines: low- (group A), medium- (group B) or high-D antigen content (group C) of an experimental Sabin IPV, control Sabin IPV (group D) or control Salk IPV (group E), on a 0-1-2 month schedule. Participants were observed and followed up within 30 days of each dose to assess safety. Serum samples were collected before the first dose and 30 days after the third dose to assess immunogenicity. After three doses, type-1 seroconversion rates of groups A-E were 99.1%, 100.0%, 99.1%, 99.0%, and 93.4%, respectively; type-2 seroconversion rates were 93.5%, 97.1%, 98.1%, 95.1%, and 91.5%, respectively; and type-3 seroconversion rates were 95.4%, 98.1%, 98.1%, 95.1%, and 100.0%, respectively. Only type-1 seroconversion rates differed significantly for group E. The incidences of injection-site redness (A: 21.9%, B: 23.7%, C: 29.4%, D: 16.2%, E: 12.7%), swelling (A: 6.7%, B: 6.8%, C: 5.0%, D: 0.0%, E: 1.7%) and pain (A: 5.0%, B: 6.8%, C: 7.6%, D: 0.0%, E: 0.9%) all were significantly higher for experimental vaccines relative to control groups. No SAEs were detected related to vaccination, and most adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity. In conclusion, the experimental Sabin IPVs with low-, medium-, and high-D antigen content all revealed good safety and immunogenicity profiles although being more reactogenic than the control vaccines.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunization ScheduleImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedSeroconversionAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralimmunogenicityInactivated poliovirus vaccinephase Ⅱ trialSabin strainsafety

Identifiers

PMID32347778
PMCPMC7733909
OpenAlexW3018662528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.