Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347564›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LET

Elisabeth Mara, Monika Clausen, Suphalak Khachonkham, Simon Deycmar, Clara Pessy, Wolfgang Dörr, Peter Kuess, Dietmar Georg, Sylvia Gruber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisabeth MaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Monika ClausenDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Suphalak KhachonkhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simon DeycmarLaboratory of Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Clara PessyDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DörrDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter KuessDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar GeorgDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sylvia GruberDepartment of Radiation Oncology/Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATMedAustron · ATRamathibodi Hospital · THUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 642623Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation 15.0066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is commonly used in clinical proton therapy, irrespective of tissue type and depth. This in vitro study was conducted to quantify the RBE of scanned protons as a function of the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET

methodsFour human cell lines (FaDu, HaCat, Du145, SKMel) with differential (α/ß)

resultsLET

conclusionsThe sensitivity parameter (α/ß)

Indexed as

ProtonsProton TherapyCell LineHumansLinear Energy TransferRelative Biological EffectivenessProtonslinear energy transferpencil beam scanningproton therapyRBE modelingrelative biological effectivenessα/ß-ratio

Identifiers

PMID32347564
PMCPMC7496287
OpenAlexW3020701706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.