Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347561›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.

Linxi Shi, Minghui Lu, N Robert Bennett, Edward Shapiro, Jin Zhang, Richard Colbeth, Josh Star-Lack, Adam S Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Performance of Dual-Layer Flat-Panel Detectors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spectral Orbits: Combining Spectral Imaging and Non-Circular Orbits for Interventional CBCT.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linxi ShiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Minghui LuVarex Imaging Corporation, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA.
N Robert BennettDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Edward ShapiroVarex Imaging Corporation, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA.
Jin ZhangVarex Imaging Corporation, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA.
Richard ColbethVarex Imaging Corporation, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA.
Josh Star-LackVarex Imaging Corporation, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA.
Adam S WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

STANFORD CANCER IMAGING TRAINING (SCIT) PROGRAMT32CA009695 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCE L DANIEL, Jeremy Dahl · 1993 to 2026
$7.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDual-energy (DE) x-ray imaging has many clinical applications in radiography, fluoroscopy, and CT. This work characterizes a prototype dual-layer (DL) flat-panel detector (FPD) and investigates its DE imaging capabilities for applications in two-dimensional (2D) radiography/fluoroscopy and quantitative three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam CT. Unlike other DE methods like kV switching, a DL FPD obtains DE images from a single exposure, making it robust against patient and system motion.

methodsThe DL FPD consists of a top layer with a 200 µm-thick CsI scintillator coupled to an amorphous silicon (aSi) FPD of 150 µm pixel size and a bottom layer with a 550 µm thick CsI scintillator coupled to an identical aSi FPD. The two layers are separated by a 1-mm Cu filter to increase spectral separation. Images (43 × 43 cm

resultsThe spatial resolution of the top layer was substantially higher than that of the bottom layer (top layer 50% MTF = 2.2 mm

conclusionsWe characterized a prototype DL FPD and demonstrated its ability to perform accurate single-exposure DE radiography/fluoroscopy and DE-CBCT. The merits of the DL detector approach include superior spatial and temporal registration between its constituent images, and less complicated acquisition sequences.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalAnimalsFluoroscopyHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiographySwinedual energy CBCTdual energy fluoroscopydual energy radiographydual-layerflat-panel detectormaterial decompositiontumor tracking

Identifiers

PMID32347561
PMCPMC7429359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.