Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347550›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2021

Scaling up cervical cancer prevention in Western Kenya: Treatment access following a community-based HPV testing approach.

Chemtai Mungo, Saduma Ibrahim, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Hong-Ha M Truong, Craig R Cohen, Megan Huchko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chemtai MungoUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Saduma IbrahimKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth A BukusiKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hong-Ha M TruongUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Craig R CohenUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Megan HuchkoDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
TRAINEESHIPS IN AIDS PREVENTION STUDIEST32MH019105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carol Suzanne Camlin, Glenn-Milo Santos · 1989 to 2026
$15.3M
University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)National Institutes of Mental Health of the U.S. Public Health ServiceNIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019105University of California Global Health Institute (UCGHI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate access to treatment after community-based HPV testing as testing within screen-and-treat programs has the potential to lower mortality from cervical cancer in low-resource settings.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in western Kenya in 2018. Women aged 25-65 years underwent HPV self-testing. HPV-positive women were referred for cryotherapy. Participant data were obtained from questionnaires during screening and treatment. The proportion successfully accessing treatment and variables associated with successful treatment was determined.

resultsOf the 750 women included, 140 (18.6%) tested positive for HPV. Of them, 135 were notified of their results, of whom 77 (59.2%) sought treatment and 73 (52.1%) received cryotherapy. Women who received treatment had a shorter time from screening to result notification (median 92 days, interquartile range [IQR] 84-104) compared to those who did not (97 days, IQR 89-106; P=0.061). In adjusted analyses, women with a history of cervical cancer screening (odds ratio [OR] 11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-85.20) and those electing result notification through a home visit (OR 4, 95% CI 1.23-14.17) were significantly more likely to acquire treatment at follow-up.

conclusionLinkage to treatment after community-based HPV screening in this population was low, highlighting the need for strategies aimed at strengthening treatment linkage in similar settings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHumansKenyaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical DysplasiaPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancer preventionCervical cancer screeningGlobal women's healthHPV screeningLow-income countriesSee-and-treat

Identifiers

PMID32347550
PMCPMC8906492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.