Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347475›Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

A New Paradigm for Achieving a Rapid Antidepressant Response.

Gin S Malhi, Grace Morris, Erica Bell, Amber Hamilton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rapid and sustained antidepressant effects of vaporized N,N-dimethyltryptamine: a phase 2a clinical trial in treatment-resistant depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Antidepressant-like Activity of Patchouli Oil var. Tapak Tuan (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gin S MalhiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. gin.malhi@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-9091
Grace MorrisDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3598-9712
Erica BellDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8483-8497
Amber HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-4585
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The substantive delay (often 4-6 weeks) between the commencement of an antidepressant and any discernible improvement in depressive symptoms is an ongoing concern in the management of depressive disorders. This delay incurs the risk of cessation of medication, self-harm/suicide and ongoing 'damage' to the brain caused by the illness. Both historically and now, off-label polypharmacy has been used in clinical practice in an attempt to facilitate both immediate- and long-term relief from symptoms. While somewhat effective, this strategy was unregulated and associated with severe adverse side effects for patients. In this article we proffer an alternative paradigm to achieve a more rapid antidepressant response by conceptualising the gap in terms of windows of response. The Windows of Antidepressant Response Paradigm (WARP) frames treatment response as windows of time in which a clinical response can be expected following initiation of an antidepressant. The paradigm defines three distinct windows-the immediate-response window (1-2 days), fast-response window (up to 1 week) and slow-response window (from 1 week onwards). Newer agents such as rapid-acting antidepressants are considered to act within the immediate-response window, whereas atypical antipsychotic augmentation strategies are captured within the fast-response window. The slow-response window represents the delay experienced with conventional antidepressant monotherapy. Novel agents such as esketamine and brexpiprazole are discussed as examples to better understand the clinical utility of WARP. This framework can be used to guide research in this field and aide the development of newer, more effective antidepressant agents as well as providing a strategy to guide the prescription of multiple agents in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive DisorderHumansKetamineQuinolonesThiophenesAntidepressive AgentsbrexpiprazoleEsketamineKetamineQuinolonesThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID32347475
OpenAlexW3017623839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.