Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347421›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

Blended learning of radiology improves medical students' performance, satisfaction, and engagement.

Adrien Vavasseur, Fabrice Muscari, Olivier Meyrignac, Matthieu Nodot, Fabrice Dedouit, Paul Revel-Mouroz, Louis Dercle, Laura Rozenblum, Lucy Wang, Charlotte Maulat and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Adrien VavasseurService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Fabrice MuscariService de Chirurgie digestive, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Olivier MeyrignacService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Matthieu NodotIngénieur en pédagogie, service d'appui pédagogique, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Route de Narbonne, 31300, Toulouse, France.
Fabrice DedouitService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Paul Revel-MourozService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Louis DercleFaculté de pharmacie de Châtenay-Malabry, 5 Rue Jean-Baptiste Clément, 92290, Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Laura RozenblumSorbonne Université, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Lucy WangColumbia University, 116th St & Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Charlotte MaulatService de Chirurgie digestive, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Hervé RousseauService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Philippe OtalService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
Laurent DercleSorbonne Université, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Fatima-Zohra MokraneService de Radiologie, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France. mokrane_fatimazohra@yahoo.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of blended learning using a combination of educational resources (flipped classroom and short videos) on medical students' (MSs) for radiology learning. MATERIAL AND

methodsA cohort of 353 MSs from 2015 to 2018 was prospectively evaluated. MSs were assigned to four groups (high, high-intermediate, low-intermediate, and low achievers) based on their results to a 20-MCQs performance evaluation referred to as the pretest. MSs had then free access to a self-paced course totalizing 61 videos based on abdominal imaging over a period of 3 months. Performance was evaluated using the change between posttest (the same 20 MCQs as pretest) and pretest results. Satisfaction was measured using a satisfaction survey with directed and spontaneous feedbacks. Engagement was graded according to audience retention and attendance on a web content management system.

resultsPerformance change between pre and posttest was significantly different between the four categories (ANOVA, P = 10

conclusionLearning formats including new pedagogical concepts as blended learning, and current technologies allow improvement in medical student's performance, satisfaction, and engagement.

Indexed as

Blended learningEducationMedical studentsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID32347421
PMCPMC7188751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.