Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347410›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2020

Estimation of age in unidentified patients via chest radiography using convolutional neural network regression.

Carl F Sabottke, Marc A Breaux, Bradley M Spieler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deep learning-based age estimation from chest CT scans.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and evaluation of a double-check support system using artificial intelligence in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carl F SabottkeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and Clinics, Lafayette, LA, USA. cfs121090@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-0845
Marc A BreauxDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and Clinics, Lafayette, LA, USA.
Bradley M SpielerDepartment of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7346-2885
University Hospital and Clinics · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient age has important clinical utility for refining a differential diagnosis in radiology. Here, we evaluate the potential for convolutional neural network models to predict patient age based on anterior-posterior chest radiographs for instances where patients may present for emergency services without the ability to provide this identifying information.

methodsWe used the CheXpert dataset of 224,316 chest radiographs from 65,240 patients to train CNN regression models with ResNet50 and DenseNet121 architectures for prediction of patient age based on anterior-posterior (AP) view chest radiographs. We evaluate these models on both the CheXpert validation dataset and a local hospital case in which a patient initially presented for emergency services intubated and without identification.

resultsMean absolute error (MAE) for our ResNet50 model on the CheXpert dataset is 4.94 years for predicting patient age based on AP chest radiographs. MAE for our DenseNet121 model is 4.69 years. Both models have a correlation coefficient between true patient ages and predicted ages of 0.944. Wilcoxon rank-sum comparison between the two model architectures shows no significant difference (p = 0.33), but both show improvement over a baseline demographic-driven estimation (p < 0.001).

conclusionsFor circumstances in which patients present for healthcare services without readily accessible identification such as in the setting trauma or altered mental status, CNN regression models for age prediction have potential clinical utility for refining estimates related to this missing patient information.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRadiography, ThoracicAge Determination by SkeletonDatasets as TopicEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsChest radiographyConvolutional neural networksDeep learningEmergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID32347410
OpenAlexW3019255791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.