Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347388›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Extended View: Totally Extra Peritoneal (e-TEP) Approach for Ventral and Incisional Hernia-Early results from a single center.

Gupta Prakhar, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi, Bharath Cumar, Rajapandian Subbaiah, V P Nalankilli, P Praveen Raj, Chinnusamy Palanivelu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A comparative study between ETEP vs. IPOM repair for ventral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Umbilical hernia repair by the eTEP, a reproducible and valuable technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gupta PrakharGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India. mailto.guptaprakhar@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4070-0816
Ramakrishnan ParthasarathiGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
Bharath CumarGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
Rajapandian SubbaiahGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
V P NalankilliGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
P Praveen RajGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
Chinnusamy PalaniveluGEM Hospital and Research Center, 45 Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopy for ventral hernia repair is now an established technique with its proven benefits of less pain, early recovery, low-recurrence rate as compared to open repair. Several techniques have been described such as IPOM, MILOS, TES, EMILOS, SCOLA, e-TEP. e-TEP was originally conceptualized as an alternative approach to inguinal hernia in difficult cases (obese, previous scars) and for training surgery residents. Application of this approach for ventral hernia repair has recently been reported by few surgeons. We present our experience of e-TEP approach for ventral hernia from a tertiary care center in South India over one year duration. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectronically maintained data of patients who underwent e-TEP for ventral hernia during a period of November 2017 to November 2018 was reviewed retrospectively. Their demographic data, intraoperative details, postoperative complications and follow up data for a period of 6 months was noted.

results171 patients underwent e-TEP approach ventral hernia repair. Mean age was 49.34 ± 10.75 years with hypertension being most common comorbidity. Mean BMI was 29.2 ± 4.1 kg/m

conclusione-TEP is a minimally invasive approach which is safe, feasible and also avoids placement of mesh in peritoneal cavity. Since it is a relatively new approach it requires further studies for standardization of techniques, criteria for patient selection and to study long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaIndiaLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePeritoneal CavityPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective Studiese-TEPLaparoscopyRives stoppaTARVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.