Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347348›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Nationwide Analysis of Urinary Retention Following Inguinal Hernia Repair: Results from the National Prospective Hernia Registry.

Farouk Drissi, Jean-François Gillion, Antoine Roquilly, François Luyckx, Emilie Duchalais, For Club Hernie

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unplanned readmissions after hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Perioperative outcome in groin hernia repair: what are the most important influencing factors?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farouk DrissiClinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne (CCDE), Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), University Hospital of Nantes, 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes, France. farouk.drissi@gmail.com.
Jean-François GillionUnité de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive, Hôpital Privé ďAntony, 1, Rue Velpeau, 92160, Antony, France.
Antoine RoquillyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital of Nantes, 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes, France.
François LuyckxService de Chirurgie Urologique, Centre Clinical, 2 Chemin de Frégeneuil, CS 42510, Soyaux, Angoulême Cedex, 16025, France.
Emilie DuchalaisClinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne (CCDE), Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), University Hospital of Nantes, 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes, France.
For Club Hernie
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHôpital Privé Jacques Cartier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary retention is one of the most common early postoperative complications following inguinal hernia repair (IHR). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and to identify associated risk factors.

methodData of consecutive patients undergoing IHR from 2011 to 2017 were collected from a national multicenter cohort. POUR was defined as the inability to void requiring urinary catheterization. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for POUR.

resultsOf 13,736 patients, 109 (0.8%) developed POUR. Patients with POUR had longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.001). IHR was performed by a laparoscopic or an open approach in 7012 (51.3%) and 6655 (48.7%) patients, respectively, and spinal anesthesia was realized in 591 (4.3%) patients. Ambulatory surgery was performed in 10,466 (76.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative dysuria (0R 3.73, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.98, p = 0.029) and spinal anesthesia (OR 7.56, p < 0.001) as independent preoperative risk factors associated with POUR. POUR was the cause of ambulatory failure in 35 (10.2%) patients who required unanticipated admission.

conclusionThe incidence of POUR following IHR remains low but impacts hospitalization settings. Preoperative risk factors for POUR should be considered for the choice of the anesthetic technique.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresAnesthesia, SpinalDiabetes MellitusDysuriaFemaleFranceHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32347348
OpenAlexW3019170475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.