Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32347184›Full record

Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

A Real-World Observational Study of Hospitalization and Health Care Costs Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Prescribed Oral Anticoagulants in the U.S. Medicare Population.

Alpesh Amin, Allison Keshishian, Jeffrey Trocio, Oluwaseyi Dina, Hannah Le, Lisa Rosenblatt, Xianchen Liu, Jack Mardekian, Qisu Zhang, Onur Baser and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rivaroxaban Versus Apixaban: A Comparison Without a Simple Solution.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alpesh AminUniversity of California, Irvine.
Allison KeshishianSTATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jeffrey TrocioPfizer, New York City, New York.
Oluwaseyi DinaPfizer, New York City, New York.
Hannah LeBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
Lisa RosenblattBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
Xianchen LiuPfizer, New York City, New York.
Jack MardekianPfizer, New York City, New York.
Qisu ZhangSTATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Onur BaserColumbia University, New York City, New York.
Anagha NadkarniBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
Lien VoBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article has been corrected. Please see J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2020;26(5):682

backgroundClinical trials have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)-including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban-are at least as effective and safe as warfarin for the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, few studies have compared oral anticoagulants (OACs) among elderly patients.

objectiveTo compare hospitalization risks (all-cause, stroke/SE-related, and MB-related) and associated health care costs among elderly nonvalvular AF (NVAF) patients in the Medicare population who initiated warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban.

methodsPatients (aged ≥ 65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) were selected from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Patients initiating each OAC were matched 1:1 to apixaban patients using propensity score matching to balance demographic and clinical characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of hospitalization of each OAC versus apixaban. Generalized linear models and two-part models with bootstrapping were used to compare all-cause health care costs and stroke/SE- and MB-related medical costs between matched cohorts.

resultsOf the 264,479 eligible patients, 77,480 warfarin-apixaban, 41,580 dabigatran-apixaban, and 77,640 rivaroxaban-apixaban patients were matched. The OACs were associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause hospitalization compared with apixaban (warfarin: HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.23-1.31,

conclusionsThis real-world study showed that among elderly NVAF patients in the Medicare population, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause, stroke/SE-related, and MB-related hospitalizations compared with warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Accordingly, apixaban showed significantly lower all-cause health care costs and MB-related medical costs. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Amin is an employee of the University of California, Irvine, and was a paid consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with this study and the development of this manuscript. He has served as a consultant and/or speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Keshishian and Zhang are employees of STATinMED Research, a paid consultant to Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with this study and the development of this manuscript. Trocio, Dina, Mardekian, and Liu are employees of Pfizer, with ownership of stocks in Pfizer. Le, Rosenblatt, Nadkarni, and Vo are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Rosenblatt and Vo have ownership of stocks in Bristol Myers Squibb. Baser has no conflicts to disclose.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID32347184
PMCPMC10398709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.