Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346934›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2020

Rabacfosadine for naïve canine intermediate to large cell lymphoma: Efficacy and adverse event profile across three prospective clinical trials.

Corey F Saba, Craig Clifford, Kristine Burgess, Brenda Phillips, David Vail, Zachary Wright, Katie Curran, Timothy Fan, Robyn Elmslie, Gerald Post and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, VeterinaryMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Corey F SabaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0590-0801
Craig CliffordHope Veterinary Specialists, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kristine BurgessDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-1333
Brenda PhillipsVeterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
David VailSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Zachary WrightVCA Animal Diagnostic Clinic, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Katie CurranCarlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Timothy FanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Robyn ElmslieVRCC Veterinary Specialty & Emergency Hospital, Englewood, Colorado, USA.
Gerald PostChief Medical Officer, FidoCure, Palo Alto, CA.
Douglas ThammColorado State University Flint Animal Cancer Centre, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Austin Diagnostic Clinic · USCarolina Veterinary Specialists · USColorado State University · USOregon State University · USOrthopedic Specialty Hospital · USTufts University · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While current lymphoma therapies induce remission in most dogs, drug-resistant relapse is common, creating a need for novel agents. Rabacfosadine (RAB), a double prodrug of the acyclic nucleotide phosphonate 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethel) guanine (PMEG), preferentially targets lymphoma cells with reduced systemic toxicity compared with PMEG. Previous studies evaluating RAB administered every 21 days have suggested efficacy in both naïve and relapsed subjects; however, no large studies of RAB as a single agent have been reported in previously untreated dogs with intermediate to large cell lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RAB in dogs with previously untreated (excluding corticosteroids) lymphoma. Sixty-three dogs received up to five RAB treatments every 21 days (16 at 0.82 mg/kg and 47 at 1.0 mg/kg) as a 30 minutes intravenous infusion, with (n = 23) or without (n = 40) concurrent corticosteroids. Response assessment and adverse event (Ae) evaluation were performed every 21 days via Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) criteria. The overall response rate was 87% (52% CR, 35% PR). The overall median progression free interval was 122 days (199 for CR, 89 for PR and 153 days for all responders). T-cell immunophenotype and corticosteroid pre-treatment were predictive of inferior outcomes on multivariate analysis. AEs were most commonly of gastrointestinal origin (hyporexia/diarrhoea) and generally resolved with supportive treatment and/or dosage adjustment. Three dogs experienced VCOG-CTCAE grade 5 delayed pulmonary fibrosis. In conclusion, RAB administered every 3 weeks is generally well tolerated and demonstrates substantial antitumour activity in dogs with previously untreated intermediate to large cell lymphoma.

Indexed as

AlanineAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleLymphomaMalePurinesTreatment OutcomeAlaninePurinesrabacfosadinecaninechemotherapylymphomarabacfosadinetreatment naive

Identifiers

PMID32346934
PMCPMC7754483
OpenAlexW3019320938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.