ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2020
Cardiac Biomarkers in the Setting of Asthma Exacerbations: a Review of Clinical Implications and Practical Considerations.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Equine Asthma in a Comparative Perspective: Cardiovascular and Neurological Manifestations of Asthma Across Different Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Predicting Asthma Exacerbations Using Machine Learning Models.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Takotsubo Syndrome: An International Expert Consensus Report on Practical Challenges and Specific Conditions (Part-1: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges)Balkan medical journal · 2024Article
- Bleomycin-induced pulmonary hypertension: an underrated phenomenon with important implications in the setting of high-risk clinical scenarios.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe present paper aims to highlight clinical implications of elevated cardiac biomarkers and associated myocardial dysfunction in a variety of cardiac and non-cardiac scenarios in patients with an asthma exacerbation, and to propose a basic algorithm for cardiovascular evaluation and triage (and hence, for further management) of these patients primarily based on evaluation of cardiac biomarkers along with basic diagnostic modalities and specific cardiac symptoms in the hospital setting. RECENT
findingsElevation of cardiac biomarkers in the setting of an asthma exacerbation mostly signifies a new-onset subclinical myocardial dysfunction/injury generally associated with certain asthma-related factors including acute hypoxemia and bronchodilator therapy, and usually has a limited prognostic value in these patients. On the other hand, elevation of these biomarkers in patients with an asthma exacerbation might also denote a variety of certain life-threatening cardiac or non-cardiac conditions associated with significant myocardial dysfunction (acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), sepsis, etc.) that might be masked by the rampant course of the asthma exacerbation, and hence, might possibly go undetected potentially aggravating the prognosis in a portion of these patients. In patients with an asthma exacerbation, it seems imperative to timely diagnose and manage emerging diverse clinical conditions particularly through the guidance of cardiac biomarkers and associated myocardial dysfunction patterns in an effort to improve overall prognosis in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.