Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346809›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

Diffusion processes modeling in magnetic resonance imaging.

Sergey Morozov, Kristina Sergunova, Alexey Petraikin, Ekaterina Akhmad, Stanislav Kivasev, Dmitry Semenov, Ivan Blokhin, Igor Karpov, Anton Vladzymyrskyy, Alexander Morozov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantom.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relaxation-Diffusion Spectrum Imaging for Probing Tissue Microarchitecture.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sergey MorozovResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia. morozov@npcmr.ru.
Kristina SergunovaResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Alexey PetraikinResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Ekaterina AkhmadResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Stanislav KivasevHospital center of polyclinics AO, 1-3, ul. Bakuninskaya, Moscow, 105005, Russia.
Dmitry SemenovResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Ivan BlokhinResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Igor KarpovCentral Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics named after N. N. Priorov, 10, ul. Priorova, Moscow, 127299, Russia.
Anton VladzymyrskyyResearch and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 28-1, ul. Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya, Moscow, 109029, Russia.
Alexander MorozovCentral Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics named after N. N. Priorov, 10, ul. Priorova, Moscow, 127299, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe paper covers modern approaches to the evaluation of neoplastic processes with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and proposes a physical model for monitoring the primary quantitative parameters of DWI and quality assurance. Models of hindered and restricted diffusion are studied. MATERIAL AND

methodTo simulate hindered diffusion, we used aqueous solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone with concentrations of 0 to 70%. We created siloxane-based water-in-oil emulsions that simulate restricted diffusion in the intracellular space. To obtain a high signal on DWI in the broadest range of b values, we used silicon oil with high T

resultsWe developed phantom with control substances for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements ranging from normal tissue to benign and malignant lesions: from 2.29 to 0.28 mm

conclusionThe phantom can be used to assess the accuracy of the ADC measurements, as well as the effectiveness of fat suppression. The control substances (emulsions) can be used as a body marker for quality assurance in whole-body DWI with a wide range of b values.

Indexed as

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imagingEmulsionImaging phantomMagnetic resonance imagingWater diffusion

Identifiers

PMID32346809
PMCPMC7188746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.