Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346804›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2020

Feasibility of using a computer-assisted working memory training program for healthy older women.

Fahimeh Ghavidel, Javad Salehi Fadardi, Nicole M Gatto, Fereshteh Sedaghat, Zahra Tabibi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fahimeh GhavidelDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 9177948991, Mashhad, Iran.
Javad Salehi FadardiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 9177948991, Mashhad, Iran. j.s.fadardi@um.ac.ir.
Nicole M GattoClaremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
Fereshteh SedaghatSedaghat Cognitive Neuroscience Clinic, Mashhad, Iran.
Zahra TabibiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 9177948991, Mashhad, Iran.
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad · IRClaremont Graduate University · USInstitute for Cognitive Science Studies · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions for age-associated cognitive impairment are of increasing significance as populations age. Using N-back and memory strategy enhancement, the present study aimed to explore the feasibility of using, and outcomes of a working memory (WM) training program on visuospatial and verbal WM in older female adults. Older women from two comparable local health centers who scored 26 and higher on Mini-Mental State Examination were invited to participate. Women at one center (experimental group) received three sessions on memory enhancement techniques and a computerized training program with N-back. Women at the other center (control group) received three sessions on memory and aging and training on using various features of cellphones. All participants completed the Corsi Block Task and Digit Span Task at pre- and post-training. The experimental group showed significant improvements in their visuospatial and verbal WM compared to the control group. These findings support the brain's plasticity in the elderly. WM training for improving cognitive performance in older adults has potential and should be further investigated.

Indexed as

LearningMemory, Short-TermAgedAgingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansCognitive trainingElderlyN-back taskOlder adultsVisuospatial working memory

Identifiers

PMID32346804
OpenAlexW3020465638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.